[cisco-voip] 7970 phones won't register in Lab
Brian Meade
bmeade90 at vt.edu
Tue Jun 3 14:57:30 EDT 2014
Florian,
That's good information but I don't believe it applies here. This would be
after the phone has its config file and is in the process of registering
via SCCP. I think the Station Capabilities Response is what is getting
lost here. I had the same issue trying to register my 7861s on my lab
cluster. I had to lower the MTU in CUCM in order for the TCP MSS to get
updated to a lower value.
Brian
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Florian Kroessbacher <
florian.kroessbacher at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hy
>
> 8.3.3 does everything through udp tftp
> 9.3. does the new method over http 6970 (so the size is greater than the
> udp 576 Bytes)
>
> look here
>
> http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cuipph/7900_series/firmware/9_3_1/release_notes/P790_BK_RF1DAED3_00_rn-9_3_1-7900-series/P790_BK_RF1DAED3_00_rn-9_3_1-7900-series_chapter_00.html#P790_RF_H0DA5A91_00
>
> Florian Kroessbacher
>
> gmail: florian.kroessbacher at gmail.com
>
>
> 2014-06-03 19:38 GMT+02:00 Brian Meade <bmeade90 at vt.edu>:
>
>> You can do the capture on the CUCM side via CLI but that doesn't help you
>> prove you lost a packet since you'll also need from the phone side via Span
>> To PC:
>>
>> utils network capture eth0 size all count 100000 file 7970testreg
>> Press Ctr+c to end the capture after the reject.
>>
>> You can get the capture from RTMT via Trace&Log Central->Collect
>> Files->Packet Capture Logs (on 2nd page).
>> You can also use SFTP:
>> file get activelog platform/cli/7970testreg.cap
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Mike King <me at mpking.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hmm..
>>>
>>> Before I bust out my span sessions, is there a way to packet capture
>>> from the CUCM / Phone?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Brian Meade <bmeade90 at vt.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sounds like an MTU issue to me based on those logs. Get captures from
>>>> the phone side and CUCM.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Mike King <me at mpking.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Now I'm more confused.
>>>>> Did I pull the right Traces?
>>>>>
>>>>> <ServiceName name="Cisco CallManager">
>>>>> <ServiceName name="Cisco Tftp">
>>>>>
>>>>> This is from the Callmanager trace: (attached is the whole log,
>>>>> device MAC is 0019AAAA3EB6)
>>>>>
>>>>> 00268821.002 |12:51:14.196 |AppInfo |EndPointTransientConnection - An
>>>>> endpoint attempted to register but did not complete registration Connecting
>>>>> Port:2000 Device name:SEP0019AAAA3EB6 Device IP address:10.103.5.133 Device
>>>>> type:119 Reason Code:27 Protocol:SCCP Device MAC address:0019AAAA3EB6
>>>>> IPAddressAttributes:3 LastSignalReceived:StationResponseTimerType
>>>>> StationState:wait_capabilities App ID:Cisco CallManager Cluster
>>>>> ID:StandAloneCluster Node ID:BE6K-CUCM
>>>>> 00268821.003 |12:51:14.197 |AlarmErr |AlarmClass: CallManager,
>>>>> AlarmName: EndPointTransientConnection, AlarmSeverity: Error, AlarmMessage:
>>>>> , AlarmDescription: An endpoint attempted to register but did not complete
>>>>> registration, AlarmParameters: ConnectingPort:2000,
>>>>> DeviceName:SEP0019AAAA3EB6, IPAddress:10.103.5.133, DeviceType:119,
>>>>> Reason:27, Protocol:SCCP, MACAddress:0019AAAA3EB6, IPAddrAttributes:3,
>>>>> LastSignalReceived:StationResponseTimerType,
>>>>> StationState:wait_capabilities, AppID:Cisco CallManager,
>>>>> ClusterID:StandAloneCluster, NodeID:BE6K-CUCM,
>>>>> 00268821.004 |12:51:14.197 |AppInfo |StationD: (0001646)
>>>>> RegisterReject text=''.
>>>>> 00268822.000 |12:51:14.198 |AppInfo
>>>>> |-->RISCMAccess::DeviceTransientConnection(...)
>>>>> 00268823.000 |12:51:14.198 |AppInfo |Device Transient deviceName :
>>>>> SEP0019AAAA3EB6, IPAddress : 10.103.5.133, IPv6Address : not shown,
>>>>> IPv4Attribute :3, IPv6Attribute :0, Protocol : 1
>>>>> 00268824.000 |12:51:14.198 |AppInfo |DebugMsg deviceName :
>>>>> SEP0019AAAA3EB6, DeviceType : 119, risClass: 1
>>>>> 00268825.000 |12:51:14.198 |AppInfo
>>>>> |<--RISCMAccess::DeviceTransientConnection(...)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) <
>>>>> rratliff at cisco.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> > Any Idea's why the phones are being rejected?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not from that log that I can tell. Look at the CCM traces. Obvious
>>>>>> reasons are wrong device model in the database, not in the database at all
>>>>>> and auto-registration is disabled, phone configured with a secure profile
>>>>>> requiring an LSC and none is present.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Ryan
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Jun 3, 2014, at 11:08 AM, Mike King <me at mpking.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We just purchased a BE6K to setup a lab.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've run through the setup, and have that all sorted, or so I think.
>>>>>> (So the environment may or may not be the issue)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We have a couple of very phones we were going to recycle.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Right now we have two, a 7970, and a 7971.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The started life phone firmware at 6.0(2). Utilizing factory
>>>>>> defaulting off my laptop, I got them to 8.3.3. (I couldn't get them to
>>>>>> associated with 6.0(2))
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Running 8.3.3, they were able to register, and function.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I pushed the firmware up to 9.3(1SR3.1S)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now none of the phones are registering. I've read the release notes,
>>>>>> and I should be able to goto 9.3.1 from 8.3.3 directly on these phones,
>>>>>> with no further intermediate releases.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Attached is one of the phone logs. Both phone's are showing the same
>>>>>> behavior.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The phone is just sitting there with the wrong date and time in the
>>>>>> corner, and every once and awhile will print out "Registration Rejected: "
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any Idea's why the phones are being rejected?
>>>>>> <log199.log>_______________________________________________
>>>>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>>>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20140603/9a41010f/attachment.html>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list