[cisco-voip] CUCM engineering special versions

Brian Meade bmeade90 at vt.edu
Mon Mar 3 14:51:11 EST 2014


What's the full CUCM version you were on and what's the ES version you were
trying to install?  You can't install a lower CUCM version but the ES may
actually by a newer version than what you're currently on.

Brian


On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Eric Pedersen
<PedersenE at bennettjones.com>wrote:

>  So the ES I was given failed to install. CUCM wouldn't accept it because
> it was a lower version number, and I didn't see anything in the readme
> about this. I'm waiting to see what TAC has to say. Has anyone installed a
> lower version number CUCM patch?
>
>
>
> *From:* Brian Meade (brmeade) [mailto:brmeade at cisco.com<brmeade at cisco.com>]
>
> *Sent:* 19 February 2014 4:40 PM
> *To:* Eric Pedersen; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* RE: CUCM engineering special versions
>
>
>
> Eric,
>
>
>
> The SU version numbers don't exactly line up with the ES version numbers.
>
>
>
> 9.1.2.11900-12 (9.1.2 SU1) was actually built off of the 9.1.2.11006-1
> Engineering Special so the 9.1.2.11021.1 ES he told you to go to will
> indeed be a newer release.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Brian
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net<cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net>]
> *On Behalf Of *Eric Pedersen
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 19, 2014 6:13 PM
> *To:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] CUCM engineering special versions
>
>
>
> TAC is suggesting we go to CUCM 9.1.2. 11021.1, which is an engineering
> special, to fix a defect. We're already on 9.1.2 SU1. The version number
> for this is 9.1.2.11900-12 which is higher than the ES. I thought patches
> always meant going up in version numbers. Do SU versions work differently
> than ESs or is the engineer offering the wrong version?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Eric
>
> The contents of this message may contain confidential and/or privileged
>
> subject matter. If this message has been received in error, please contact
>
> the sender and delete all copies. Like other forms of communication,
>
> e-mail communications may be vulnerable to interception by unauthorized
>
> parties. If you do not wish us to communicate with you by e-mail, please
>
> notify us at your earliest convenience. In the absence of such
>
> notification, your consent is assumed. Should you choose to allow us to
>
> communicate by e-mail, we will not take any additional security measures
>
> (such as encryption) unless specifically requested.
>
>
>
>  The contents of this message may contain confidential and/or privileged
> subject matter. If this message has been received in error, please contact
> the sender and delete all copies. Like other forms of communication,
> e-mail communications may be vulnerable to interception by unauthorized
> parties. If you do not wish us to communicate with you by e-mail, please
> notify us at your earliest convenience. In the absence of such
> notification, your consent is assumed. Should you choose to allow us to
> communicate by e-mail, we will not take any additional security measures
> (such as encryption) unless specifically requested.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20140303/b21665b5/attachment.html>


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list