[cisco-voip] should I rebuild cluster from scratch after upgrade from v7 to v9?

[Lelio Fulgenzi]

As far as I can tell, the 187 are SIP only. It is SIP on my v7 cluster. 

Have you considered vg202+/vg204+?

They're basically a small density vg224 and can support all the protocols. A bit more pricey than an ATA though. 

Sent from my iPhone

On 2014-03-06, at 12:43 PM, "Madziarczyk, Jonathan" <jmad at cityofevanston.org> wrote:

> So long as the ATA goes to a real analog phone and not some other device (fax/elevator/etc).  When you jump to 9.x the 187s can only do SIP (I think 7x and 8x support sccp as well) and all hell breaks loose.  From what I can tell you lose CPC disconnect and Power-denial.  That’s been my nightmare for the last 3 months.
>  
>  
>  
> From: Lelio Fulgenzi [mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca] 
> Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 6:12 PM
> To: Madziarczyk, Jonathan
> Cc: cisco-voip voyp list
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] should I rebuild cluster from scratch after upgrade from v7 to v9?
>  
> We have one ATA. The one that is SIP. 187 I think. 
>  
> Have experienced problems with ATAs?
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On 2014-03-05, at 3:31 PM, "Madziarczyk, Jonathan" <jmad at cityofevanston.org> wrote:
> 
> Yes, I believe the aligned partitions issue is VMware specific.
>  
> I don’t know what Cisco has to say about it, but I always feel better knowing the install was direct from a fresh 9 install rather than a 7->9 upgrade.  Since the DRS backup and restore from an upgraded 9x onto a fresh 9x is acceptable in the Jump Upgrade in VMware I don’t see a problem with it on the physical side.
>  
> On a side note, are you using any ATAs?
>  
>  
>  
> From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
> Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 12:44 PM
> To: Dennis Heim
> Cc: cisco-voip voyp list
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] should I rebuild cluster from scratch after upgrade from v7 to v9?
>  
> Thanks Dennis. I  believe that 'aligned partitions' are a VM issue only? I am currently on MCS (HP equiv) servers.
> 
> Lelio
> 
> 
> 
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
> Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
> University of Guelph
> 
> 519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354
> lelio at uoguelph.ca
> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
> Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
> Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1
>  
> From: "Dennis Heim" <Dennis.Heim at wwt.com>
> To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>, "cisco-voip voyp list" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2014 1:37:24 PM
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] should I rebuild cluster from scratch after upgrade        from v7 to v9?
> 
> Aligned partitions.
>  
> Dennis Heim | Solution Architect (Collaboration)
> World Wide Technology, Inc. | 314-212-1814
>  
> PS Engineering:  Innovate & Ignite.
>  
>  
> From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
> Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 10:56 AM
> To: cisco-voip voyp list
> Subject: [cisco-voip] should I rebuild cluster from scratch after upgrade from v7 to v9?
>  
> 
> I have an opportunity (maybe, if time permits) to rebuild an off-line cluster after I upgrade it from v7 to v9.
> 
> The question is, is there any advantage to building a cluster from scratch and restore from DRS, so that it is built from v9 installation media rather than from a v7 upgrade?
> 
> I recall seeing a number of bugs in the past that said something to the effect of "...if installation was an upgrade, disk space, etc. etc...."
> 
> Can anything thing of any advantages of doing this? This will help us test our disaster recovery process as well.
> 
> Lelio
> 
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
> Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
> University of Guelph
> 
> 519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354
> lelio at uoguelph.ca
> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
> Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
> Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1
>  
>  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20140306/684031b8/attachment.html>