[cisco-voip] Multicast MOH streaming devices

[James Buchanan]

I have done this with the Syn-Apps device (and replaced the E&M way of
doing it). The sound was much better than the E&M. I'm not sure how it
would measure against the Barix in the same situation, but I think the
Barix is less expensive.


On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 6:06 AM, Tim Smith <tim.smith at enject.com.au> wrote:

> Thanks, that sounds like a possibility. I guess it depends if it runs
> independently. I have a Syn-apps contact, I'll see what I can find out.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Tim
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Erick Bergquist [mailto:erickbee at gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, 23 May 2014 2:01 PM
> To: Tim Smith
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Multicast MOH streaming devices
>
> I've heard second hand the Syn-Apps pager relay appliance can do this but
> have no first hand experience (yet).
>
> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:32 PM, Tim Smith <tim.smith at enject.com.au>
> wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> >
> >
> > Does anyone have any alternative to Barix? (no issue with Barix, just
> > looking for some comparisons)
> >
> >
> >
> > Seems Cisco is “recommending” Barix in their upgrade presos at Live.
> >
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> >
> >
> > Tim
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20140523/adff4ada/attachment.html>