[cisco-voip] Remove lines on phones with BAT

Scott Voll svoll.voip at gmail.com
Thu Oct 30 11:20:04 EDT 2014


how about a shared line per floor?

Scott


On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 8:09 AM, Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) <rratliff at cisco.com
> wrote:

>  And no,  you can't put a shared line on 1300 phones. Use a different DN
> range or something and let CER handle the translations for you just like it
> would any other phone.
>
> -Ryan
>
>  On Oct 30, 2014, at 11:03 AM, Erick Wellnitz <ewellnitzvoip at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>  Use a partition that isn't accessible by anything except CER CTI ports.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> OK I get the picture.......
>>
>>  So if I'm going to put a line on all phones, can I put a shared line on
>> all 1300 phones?  If so, how does CER work?  will the PSAP call back the
>> line or does it call back the phone?
>>
>>  I have a dialing plan that doesn't allow for much in the way of non DID
>> numbers so have a very limited amount to use.
>>
>>  TIA
>>
>>  Scott
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Wes Sisk (wsisk) <wsisk at cisco.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Agreed with Ryan, Anthony, and Erick.
>>>
>>>  Give the phones DN’s, even just internal DN’s. It is “burning a DN” in
>>> the sense that number is allocated. That number does not have to be a DID.
>>> Give the phones/lines a CSS that PLAR’s to a help desk. Or at least allow
>>> them to invoke local emergency services - private or public.
>>>
>>>  -Wes
>>>
>>>  On Oct 29, 2014, at 3:13 PM, Erick Wellnitz <ewellnitzvoip at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>  Not having lines on a physical phone can be a career altering decision
>>> if someone needs to dial emergency services and they grab the
>>> nearest logged out phone.  There could also be legal issues but I'm not a
>>> lawyer so take that for what you will.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Anthony Holloway <
>>> avholloway+cisco-voip at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> That's a "Yes" for my experiences.  The logout profile or default state
>>>> of the phone has a nonDID in most cases, DID in a few cases (with a CSS
>>>> restriction for Internal and EMS), and the UDP of the user has a DID in
>>>> most cases, nonDID in a few cases (with typical CSS).
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> So what are people doing in a Extension Mobility only environment?
>>>>> Burning two DN's?  one for the user and one for every phone?
>>>>>
>>>>>  scott
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) <
>>>>> rratliff at cisco.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Auto-reg will provision lines as well, and I agree with Anthony.
>>>>>> I don't think anyone wants to deal with the potential issue of
>>>>>> somebody picking up a phone to dial emergency services and not getting
>>>>>> dialtone.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Ryan
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  On Oct 29, 2014, at 2:05 PM, Anthony Holloway <
>>>>>> avholloway+cisco-voip at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Scott,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  SIP or SCCP, either way, for emergency reasons you don't want phones
>>>>>> laying about, unable to save a life when people depend on the reliability
>>>>>> of 911.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Here's one option without knowing your environment design or
>>>>>> limitations:  Setup Auto Registration and then Bulk Delete all the phones.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) <
>>>>>> rratliff at cisco.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> All phones? SIP phones won't register without a line.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Ryan
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Oct 28, 2014, at 1:16 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> is there a way to bulk delete all lines on all phones?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> we are moving to extension mobility and want to remove all the lines
>>>>>>> on all the phones
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> scott
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> CM 8.6.2
>>>>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>>>>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>>>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>>>>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>>>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>>
>>>>
>>>  _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20141030/35e3f53c/attachment.html>


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list