[cisco-voip] SCCP/SDL trace question re:transfer
Ed Leatherman
ealeatherman at gmail.com
Tue Sep 2 10:35:54 EDT 2014
Dan,
I'm not seeing a MXTimeout, however the "Cannot Complete Transfer" is 12
seconds after the ISDN Proceeding. Any special trace settings necessary to
see that message?
22:58:38.411 |AppInfo |In Message -- PriCallProceedingMsg -- Protocol=
PriNi2Protocol
..
22:58:50.310 |AppInfo |StationD: (0331221) DisplayNotify
timeOutValue=15 notify='Cannot Complete Transfer' content='Cannot Complete
Transfer' ver=12.
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Daniel Pagan <dpagan at fidelus.com> wrote:
> Ed:
>
>
>
> As a test, are you able to recreate the issue when PSTN leg doesn’t answer
> for 12 seconds after the transfer attempt? I ask because, based on the
> timestamps below, it seems the media exchange timer might be expiring. If
> you still have SDL traces, you can search for “MXTimeout”. If you find one,
> you should be able to backtrack 12 seconds and find the ISDN Call
> Proceeding message that triggers CUCM’s attempt at connecting media between
> the two call-legs.
>
>
>
> - Dan
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf
> Of *Sreekanth Narayanan
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 02, 2014 2:22 AM
> *To:* Ed Leatherman
> *Cc:* Mike Nickolich; Cisco VOIP
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] SCCP/SDL trace question re:transfer
>
>
>
> Hi Ed,
>
>
>
> If the Unity is sending the 2nd transfer command as soon as the initial
> call setup begins, it looks more like a blind transfer. The other transfer
> type 'Supervise Transfer' is the consult transfer. Have you tried to do
> blind transfers from SCCP phones?
>
>
>
> As per the RTS description, it's the responsibility of the CUCM to handle
> the call if the target of the transfer is busy or doesn't answer.
>
> - Release to Switch—Unity Connection puts the caller on hold, dials
> the extension, and releases the call to the phone system. When the line is
> busy or is not answered, the phone system—not Unity Connection—forwards the
> call to the user or handler greeting. This transfer type allows Unity
> Connection to process incoming calls more quickly. Use Release to Switch
> only when call forwarding is enabled on the phone system.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Sreekanth
>
>
>
>
>
> On 1 September 2014 19:29, Ed Leatherman <ealeatherman at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Sreekanth,
>
>
>
> The problem is inconsistent, but definitely more than say 20%. Load on our
> systems doesn't appear to be an issue, we did testing late at night/after
> hours and regular call volume is very low then. We were able to duplicate
> the issue just with cell phones as the target, so it seems the problem is
> not just the answering service not picking up; not had a problem where
> direct calls weren't answered promptly.
>
>
>
> In looking through the trace files, it seems like Unity does a consult
> transfer even when set to "Release to switch", its just sending the 2nd
> transfer command as soon as the initial call setup starts - IIRC it was
> doing it right after we got "PROCEEDING" from PSTN.
>
>
>
> I did check out the T301 timer in CUCM but its still set to 3 minutes - so
> we're not hitting that one at least.
>
>
>
> Your idea of reproducing the issue with a consultative transfer from a
> phone is a good one, we'll give that a try.
>
>
>
> For now we just have their line directly forwarded after hours manually
> and skipping Unity completely and it works. They pay per call to the
> answering service though so they really want the front end IVR to pick up
> first. It is a suicide prevention hotline and they are very sensitive to us
> throwing solutions at it until something works - I'll have to at least pin
> down the part that is failing before they will accept a workaround. I have
> a mini UCCX script setup to do a call redirect to the number, if I can
> verify that it is the consultative transfer that is the issue I plan on
> just sending the call from Unity to UCCX and letting UCCX get the call
> offsite - will probably just move the whole call tree to UCCX for IVR at
> that point.
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks for your ideas!!
>
>
> Ed
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 3:04 AM, Sreekanth Narayanan <sknth.n at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Ed,
>
>
>
> Could it be possible that the answering service does not answer the call
> sometimes? This may be causing the timeout.
>
> From the POV of the CUCM, this is just another regular outgoing call over
> PRI starting from a VM port (which acts like an SCCP phone), which would
> then do the transfer to the initial caller.
>
> The transfer type in your case seems to be semi-attended or consult
> transfer and not blind. I don't know if this can be changed on Unity.
>
>
>
> What is the frequency of this issue? In 10 calls transferred this way, how
> many times do you see it?
>
> Maybe you could try a couple of different tests here to try and isolate
> the issue:
>
> 1. Make direct calls from an IP phone (sccp preferably) to the answering
> service and see if the answering service picks the call up every time
> without fail.
>
> 2. Make an inbound call to the CUCM from PSTN, and direct this call to an
> sccp phone (this is replacing the Unity), and then do a blind, consult
> transfer (2 different tests) to the answering service and see if you can
> reproduce the problem.
>
>
>
> Thanks
> Sreekanth
>
>
>
> On 1 September 2014 00:28, Ed Leatherman <ealeatherman at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
>
>
> I'm trying to help chase down a intermittent issue where Unity needs to
> transfer a caller off-site to an answering service, and sometimes the
> transfer doesn't complete and the caller gets left on-hold. I was hoping
> someone could explain a message i'm seeing in the traces during a failure.
>
>
>
> SCCP integration to unity connection. 9.1 software versions on both CUCM
> and Unity. MGCP to PRI gateways. All gateways are set to offnet and service
> parameter is configured to allow transfers between offnet to rule that out
> as a issue.
>
>
>
> On the trace side of things, for the transfer leg on a failure I see:
>
> 19:55:27.146 : Unity "presses transfer" , dials out the digits
>
> 19:55:29.853 : Q931 IN from PSTN for the transfer leg, PROGRESS message
>
> 19:55:29.855 : CUCM OUT to Unity: Call State Ring out
>
> *19:55:41.020 : CUCM OUT to Unity: DisplayNotify timeOutValue=15
> notify='Cannot Complete Transfer' content='Cannot Complete Transfer' ver=12*
>
>
>
> It looks like an abnormal amount of time for the call to connect, is that
> a possible reason for the "Cannot Complete Transfer" message? Is the
> timeout tweakable someplace?
>
>
>
> On successful tries, the transfer leg connects faster (less than 10
> seconds). So far we haven't found anything else different on our own; have
> a TAC case open on it but getting shuffled between groups now (unity team
> wants CUCM team to look at it).
>
>
>
> Unity never seems to retrieve the caller from hold or try again,
> eventually the caller hangs up (I see the the DISCONNECT message from PSTN)
> at which point that call leg gets torn down.
>
>
>
> Any ideas much appreciated
>
>
>
> Ed
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Ed Leatherman
>
>
>
--
Ed Leatherman
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20140902/e58ffbc7/attachment.html>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list