[cisco-voip] Limiting concurrent video

[Anthony Holloway]

I had a failed reply attempt (long story, my email address is a hint), and
I mentioned to Jason that by default, CUCM will combine Immersive calls
with desktop video calls into the same video bandwidth pool. But, starting
with CUCM version 9 (I believe), there is a service parameter under regions
and locations which allows you to change from true to false, so that this
doesn't have to happen. Just pop open CM Svc params and CTRL+F for
Immersive. I'm on my phone or I'd copy paste the name for you.

My understanding is that immersive calls are any DC, EX, SX, etc device
registered to CUCM. However, this page would maybe disagree with that.

http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/srnd/collab09/clb09/endpnts.html

On Thursday, September 11, 2014, Erick <erickbee at gmail.com> wrote:

> There are two types of video location bandwidth , regular video and
> immersive. Different values for each pool.
>
> Still haven't found a concrete resource that lists which endpoints support
> immersive type or if you choose video type on sip profile applied to
> endpoint and it uses that ?
>
>
> The issue (challenge?) I'm working on scheme for is how to reserve
> bandwidth for actual bigger telepresence rooms vs desktop video from
> someone's desk phone / jabber at same location without having separate
> location (bandwidth pools) for both.
>
> Don 't want 10 people on video calls on their desk phone using all video
> bandwidth then people with scheduled telepresence meeting on bigger
> dedicated unit in conference room not able to do their call because others
> are using up all the bandwidth .
>
> A couple solutions , not ideal .. Reserve large amount of bandwidth for
> the conference room with big unit and put desktop video devices in Lower
> bandwidth location and set it to low value ... So there is b/w available
> for the conference room unit  And it'll work when people use it.
>
> But if you have Lower b/w for desk units not many people will get video
> calls..
>
> Almost need a way to be able to bump active desktop video calls to audio
> only when a bigger dedicated telepresence unit places a call so it is able
> to do its job.
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Sep 10, 2014, at 10:31 AM, "Jason Aarons (AM)" <
> jason.aarons at dimensiondata.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jason.aarons at dimensiondata.com');>> wrote:
>
>  Ok sorry that was a brain fart.
>
>
>
> Duh!
>
>
>
> Pre 9.x the  Hub and Spoke was assumed by CUCM Locations CAC.
>
>
>
> With 9x we have the new Enhanced Location Call Admission Control.
>
> LBM Group
>
> Locations
>
> Links/Weights
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* bmeade90 at gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','bmeade90 at gmail.com');> [
> mailto:bmeade90 at gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','bmeade90 at gmail.com');>] *On Behalf Of *Brian
> Meade
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 10, 2014 11:19 AM
> *To:* Jason Aarons (AM)
> *Cc:* cisco-voip (cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cisco-voip at puck.nether.net');>)
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Limiting concurrent video
>
>
>
>
>
> You should be able to use Location-based CAC for the Video calls.  You can
> set a total video bandwidth there.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Jason Aarons (AM) <
> jason.aarons at dimensiondata.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jason.aarons at dimensiondata.com');>> wrote:
>
>   1.       Is there a way to limit concurrent video call configuration on
> CUCM and network side across WAN in CUCM 10.x?
>
> Does RSVP or SIP RSVP pre-conditions support limiting concurrent video
> between clusters? Or the WAN? From what I can tell the answer is no.
>
> Endpoints are SCCP/9971s.
>
>
>
> I can set the Region information but that limits per call.  Can I say I
> only want 384k h264 video calls to use up to a total of 10MB.  And let cucm
> keep track of the bandwidth being used? Or for video am I limited to QoS in
> the WAN routers?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Jason Aarons
>
> Consultant
>
> Dimension Data
>
> +1-904-338-3245
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cisco-voip at puck.nether.net');>
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
>
>
> itevomcid
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cisco-voip at puck.nether.net');>
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20140911/e3a04637/attachment.html>