[cisco-voip] PER CALL BANDWIDTH CONSUMPTION OVER ETHERNET+802.1Q

[Anthony Holloway]

Can you link us to the sources in question? I personally need a little more
context to go with your question.

In general, policing a single g711ulaw call is around 93kbps, and rounding
it to 100kbps still achieves the goal of policing a single call. And yes, a
class based policer would police media and signaling separately.

Also, I saw something on medianet at last year Cisco Live, but other than
that, I'm clueless about medianet. I can't say if and how things changed
once medianet came in to the picture. I'm sure Vik wasn't considering that
either, based on the fact that he teaches CCIE Collab boot camps, and
medianet is not a part of the blueprint.
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 4:22 AM abbas Wali <abbaseo at gmail.com> wrote:

> hi all,
>
> Vik Malhi posted that for a successful g711 call
>
> HQSW(config-pmap-c)#police 90500 8000 exc drop ! 0 packet loss
>
> now, as per Ciso medianet 4
>
> The VoIP and signaling traffic from the VVLAN can be policed to drop at 128 kbps and 32 kbps, respectively (as any excessive traffic matching this criteria would be indicative of network abuse)
>
> Question is 128 kbps supports 1 single voice stream of g711 OR if you go with Vik, you need to multiply 90500 with the number of calls you need on that port. I will assume that the sig is classified differently and handled by diff policer on that port.
>
>
> many thanks
>
>
> --
> *Abbas Wali*
>  _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20150415/e10c154d/attachment.html>