[cisco-voip] SIP analog gateways

[Haas, Neal]

We tried to put our faxes all on SIP, best solution was to move 200 DID's back to PRI, sad day.......

Thank you,
Neal Haas


From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Daniel Pagan
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 5:52 AM
To: norm.nicholson at kitchener.ca; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SIP analog gateways

I personally can't speak to 3rd party FXS gateways, but I've worked with customers in the past whose VG224s were integrated w/ CUCM via SIP trunk. The two caveats that immediately come to mind are applicable to a non-Cisco FXS gateway using SIP as well:


1)      Lack of SCCP supplementary services

http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios/voice/fxs/configuration/guide/15_1/fxs_15_1_cg_book/fxssccpsplmft.html

2)      Unable to use shared line appearances between the VG2XX and non-VG2XX device.

Just two things to keep in mind. I've seen this sometimes act as a deal breaker w/ SIP to the FXS gateway. Hope this helps in some way.

- Dan

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of norm.nicholson at kitchener.ca<mailto:norm.nicholson at kitchener.ca>
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 7:10 PM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [cisco-voip] SIP analog gateways


Anyone using a SIP FXS gateway instead of a VG224. Just trying to compare costs and ease of use.

Thanks



Norm Nicholson
Telecom Analyst
City of Kitchener
(519) 741-2200 x 7000


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20150819/9fbb499e/attachment.html>