[cisco-voip] CUBE across VRFs

[Norton, Mike]

Doesn’t have to be two VRFs, could be one VRF and the global route table, if that makes a difference. This idea is no connectivity between them, other than the application-layer connectivity provided by CUBE. This is hypothetical – I’m just trying to understand how/if this would work. I’m looking to plop a CUBE between my network and a SIP provider’s network without having to participate in routing protocol on either side.

-mn

From: Jason Aarons (AM) [mailto:jason.aarons at dimensiondata.com]
Sent: February-03-15 5:02 PM
To: Norton, Mike; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: CUBE across VRFs

You have two VRFs, do they have connectivity between them?

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Norton, Mike
Sent: Tuesday, February 3, 2015 4:36 PM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [cisco-voip] CUBE across VRFs


Can CUBE sit across two separate VRFs? I’ve never used it, but I’m envisioning an ISR having a VRF-Lite with default route pointed at my network, and a VRF-Lite with default route pointed at the SIP provider’s network. I’m thinking this would be the preferred way to do it, but maybe I’m missing something?

My Googling is dredging up a lot of really old info that I’m not sure is still relevant.

--
Mike Norton


itevomcid
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20150204/665f9ee1/attachment.html>