[cisco-voip] UCCE Patching

Ryan Burtch rburtch3 at gmail.com
Fri Feb 6 11:55:50 EST 2015


I agree w/ Matt. Patching for criticality seems to be the norm. I very much
think that if it isn't broke, don't fix it.




Sincerely,

Ryan Burtch

On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Matthew Saskin <msaskin at gmail.com> wrote:

> I've got dozens of clients that fall anywhere along the spectrum of never
> to monthly.  I'd say the majority are either patching for critical issues
> only, or quarterly plus off-cycle for critical patches.
>
> -matthew
>
> Matthew Saskin
> msaskin at gmail.com
> 203-253-9571
>
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Ken Rhodes <kenneth.rhodes at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Just a general UCCE maintenance   question for anyone out there. How do
>> you go about patching those windows servers? Do you have a policy to patch
>> them only for critical issues? Do you patch them every quarter, etc? I know
>> Cisco's stance is to follow whatever company policy dictates, however I
>> don't want to cause needless headaches. So I just want to see what everyone
>> else typically does.
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20150206/c1ff5b5e/attachment.html>


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list