[cisco-voip] DX70/80 thoughts?

Fri Feb 13 14:03:15 EST 2015

With the SIP: vs TEL:, maybe they could add that into the default webex invite at somepoint.

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[twitter]<https://twitter.com/CollabSensei>
[chat]<xmpp:dennis.heim at wwt.com>[Phone]<tel:+13142121814>[video]<sip:dennis.heim at wwt.com>
"Innovation happens on project squared" -- http://www.projectsquared.com<http://www.projectsquared.com/>

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting Room<https://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim>

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ryan Ratliff (rratliff)
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 1:38 PM
To: Ed Leatherman; Lelio Fulgenzi
Cc: cisco-voip voyp list
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] DX70/80 thoughts?

To Lelio, yes these are just like the other desktop IP phones from a network perspective.

Ed,
1.       SIP URI click to call opens an email. From working with TAC this is an Android feature.
Use tel: URIs instead of sip:.  I’ve found a couple enhancements on this but nothing committed.

2.       No screen sharing in Webex.
Roadmapped but I don’t know when it’s planned.  I *think* it’s a WebEx feature so could potentially come outside of a phone load with an app update.

3.       Screensharing is possible with CMR, but requires dialing in via SIP-URI.
This is for a connected HDMI-In device, not the native android desktop.  Works on any video call.

4.       Somewhere along the way it was redial or another function, it would drop the right hand side of a SIP-URI.
Don't recall this one off the top of my head.

5.       No MRA, but obviously that is top of mind for feature additions, I am sure.
On the roadmap.

-Ryan

On Feb 13, 2015, at 12:46 PM, Brian Meade <bmeade90 at vt.edu<mailto:bmeade90 at vt.edu>> wrote:

It's the WebEx Android app in general.  Anyone know if the iOS WebEx app support screen sharing yet?  I don't have an iPhone.

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Ed Leatherman <ealeatherman at gmail.com<mailto:ealeatherman at gmail.com>> wrote:
Ok so I wasnt crazy when I couldn't get screen sharing working with WebEx :) yes that seems like a critical fail to me

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015, 11:40 AM Heim, Dennis <Dennis.Heim at wwt.com<mailto:Dennis.Heim at wwt.com>> wrote:
I find the device to overall be nice. However, there are a few things that limit it from becoming totally persuasive from an adoption perspective:
1.       SIP URI click to call opens an email. From working with TAC this is an Android feature.
2.       No screen sharing in Webex.
3.       Screensharing is possible with CMR, but requires dialing in via SIP-URI.
4.       Somewhere along the way it was redial or another function, it would drop the right hand side of a SIP-URI.
5.       No MRA, but obviously that is top of mind for feature additions, I am sure.

When wearing my normal user hat: #1, and #2 jump out at me as critical misses. Despite those, I love the DX80. The DX70/80 really pushes the telepresence experience down to the desktop. I love the fact in a TP call I can move the video screens around by dragging or just tap twice and switch between video and presentation. In the past month that I have had my DX, I have become a video snob, and groan when a meeting isn’t a TP call.

The DX pays for itself once it has prevented 5 days of travel or less. There is no competitive advantage or anything strategic about jumping on an airplane.

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814<tel:%2B1%20314-212-1814>
<image001.png><https://twitter.com/CollabSensei>
<image002.png><image003.png><tel:+13142121814><image004.png>
"Innovation happens on project squared" -- http://www.projectsquared.com<http://www.projectsquared.com/>

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting Room<https://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim>

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net>] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 11:19 AM
To: Scott Voll
Cc: Cisco VOIP

Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] DX70/80 thoughts?

Do these phones use CDP/VoiceVLAN settings? Or are they simply a network device?
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
University of Guelph

519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354
lelio at uoguelph.ca<mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca>
www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs>
Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1

________________________________
From: "Scott Voll" <svoll.voip at gmail.com<mailto:svoll.voip at gmail.com>>
To: "Ed Leatherman" <ealeatherman at gmail.com<mailto:ealeatherman at gmail.com>>
Cc: "Cisco VOIP" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>>
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 10:06:30 AM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] DX70/80 thoughts?
We have just purchased 4 of them.  We have large conference rooms in our larger sites and use a TV and a Polycom HD unit.  But in our smaller sites (under 20 employees) these units made a lot of sense for their small conference room size and that typically only one or two people would be in, at a time.

We will see if some of our Regional Managers end up with one as a second monitor at there desk.  But that would be, due to the fact that they do a lot of video conferencing, and burn up a conference room that multiple people could use for meetings.

Only time will tell.

Scott

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 5:15 AM, Ed Leatherman <ealeatherman at gmail.com<mailto:ealeatherman at gmail.com>> wrote:
Anyone have these deployed to actually end-users? Thoughts or opinions?

I have a DX80 on loan, after i got over the "This is pretty cool" after initially getting it setup, I'm trying to figure out if/where it would be useful here (edu) at the steepish price point. We have some disability services groups that are using video now, price tag is probably out of their budget though.

--
Ed Leatherman

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20150213/2d7dbadc/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 3876 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20150213/2d7dbadc/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1389 bytes
Desc: image002.png
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20150213/2d7dbadc/attachment-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1292 bytes
Desc: image003.png
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20150213/2d7dbadc/attachment-0002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1391 bytes
Desc: image004.png
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20150213/2d7dbadc/attachment-0003.png>