[cisco-voip] Basic Jabber Deploy question

[Josh Warcop]

Not sure about that far into the selection process. I don't know if the client does that or is given a priority list


Sent from my Windows Phone
________________________________
From: Ed Leatherman<mailto:ealeatherman at gmail.com>
Sent: ‎1/‎3/‎2015 2:54 PM
To: Josh Warcop<mailto:josh at warcop.com>
Cc: Cisco VOIP<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Basic Jabber Deploy question

Interesting, thanks Josh. So does the client just pick a node running tftp
service on it's own then based on the information from UDS? The reason I
ask is I only have 2 nodes running that right now and its sounds like
either one could potentially be used by a client at any given time.

On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Josh Warcop <josh at warcop.com> wrote:

> Great question. There is a mixture of TFTP/UDS and version 9.x or 10.x
> determines what is used and when.
>
> If you deploy the _cisco-uds SRV record you don't need to specify TFTP
> because the client discovers that service via UDS from the cluster.
>
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2015 10:38:57 -0500
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Basic Jabber Deploy question
> From: ealeatherman at gmail.com
> To: josh at warcop.com
> CC: kevinp at advancedtsg.com; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>
>
> Thanks Josh,
>
> As a follow up question then, lets say my jabber client happens to resolve
> _cisco-uds to a node that isn't running TFTP service - what tells it an IP
> address/hostname of a TFTP node to collect the "phone" configuration, or is
> that delivered via the UDS connection?
>
> Kevin: CUCM v9, not running IM&P just using jabber in phone-only mode.
> Literally just using it as softphone/video client on some laptops.
>
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Josh Warcop <josh at warcop.com> wrote:
>
> Seems to be some confusion in this area...
>
> UDS runs on Tomcat and accessed over HTTPS and with recent versions
> supports SAML SSO. It's throttled so there isn't any difference pointing to
> subscribers or publisher first. The UDS service is a network service on
> each node and cannot be disabled. It has no direct dependencies on Call
> Manager or TFTP running on the same node.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> From: kevinp at advancedtsg.com
> To: ealeatherman at gmail.com; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 20:24:43 +0000
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Basic Jabber Deploy question
>
>
>  What version of CUCM/IM&P?
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf
> Of *Ed Leatherman
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 31, 2014 3:06 PM
> *To:* Cisco VOIP
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] Basic Jabber Deploy question
>
>  Hello,
>
>  I'm working on a project to deploy jabber in a limited roll-out as
> phone-only mode for a specific application. I'm interested in using srv
> records as it looks like it might be easier for end-user/students to sign
> into the client, so my question is related to that. I see that the
> _cisco-uds record is used for the client to find call manager; does this
> srv need to point to the publisher node, TFTP node, or CM node(s)? If not
> the TFTP node, how does the client know where pull it's configuration from
> once it has authenticated?
>
>  I have jabber working OK manually just by configuring the client - I'm
> just looking for ease-of-use here for the students and staff that will be
> using it.
>
>  Thanks for any clarification, most of the documents are centered around
> IM&P which isn't what i'm after right now.
>
>  Happy New Year!
>
>
>  --
>  Ed Leatherman
>
> _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
>
> --
> Ed Leatherman
>



--
Ed Leatherman
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20150103/00a156d8/attachment.html>