[cisco-voip] Expressway License Fulfilment
Dana Tong
Dana_Tong at bridgepoint.com.au
Tue Jan 6 16:45:35 EST 2015
Thanks Matt,
I obtained the original eDelivery notification from the disti and found that there was an additional PAK in the order that they didn't forward on.
Cheers for the clarification.
Thanks
Dana
________________________________
From: Matthew Loraditch [MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 7 January 2015 1:29 AM
To: Dana Tong; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net (cisco-voip at puck.nether.net)
Subject: RE: Expressway License Fulfilment
You should have gotten another release key. Your BOM matches my BOMs and I get 3 PAKs, 2 release and 1 option key. For the RMS you may have gotten another, I’m not sure, you will need the RMS license split though as 5 need to go on each server. In the future you may want to split the RMS order up.
HTH
Matthew G. Loraditch – CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R&S, CCDA
Network Engineer
Direct Voice: 443.541.1518
Facebook<https://www.facebook.com/heliontech?ref=hl> | Twitter<https://twitter.com/HelionTech> | LinkedIn<https://www.linkedin.com/company/helion-technologies?trk=top_nav_home> | G+<https://plus.google.com/+Heliontechnologies/posts>
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Dana Tong
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2015 12:23 AM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net (cisco-voip at puck.nether.net)
Subject: [cisco-voip] Expressway License Fulfilment
Hi all,
Would you please clarify something for me regarding the Expressway Licensing?
I’ve ordered the Expressway and RMS licenses using the following BOM (essentially selecting 10 RMS licenses for 5 concurrent calls). The customer has CUCM with a handful of SX20’s.
1.0
R-CBE6K-K9
Cisco Business Edition 6000-Electronic SW Delivery-Top Level
N/A
21 days
No
1
1.0.1
CON-ECMU-RCBE6KK
SWSS UPGRADES Cisco Business Editi
36 month(s)
N/A
No
1
1.1
BE6K-SW-10.X
Business Edition 6000 v10 export restricted software
N/A
21 days
No
1
1.2
UC-8.X-OR-EARLIER
Version 8.x or Earlier
N/A
14 days
No
1
1.3
EXPWY-VE-C-K9
Cisco Expressway-C Server Virtual Edition
N/A
21 days
No
1
1.3.0.1
CON-ECMU-EXPWYVEC
SWSS UPGRADES Cisco Expressway-C S
36 month(s)
N/A
No
1
1.4
EXPWY-VE-E-K9
Cisco Expressway-E Server Virtual Edition
N/A
21 days
No
1
1.4.0.1
CON-ECMU-EXPWYVEE
SWSS UPGRADES Cisco Expressway-E Server Virtual Editi
36 month(s)
N/A
No
1
1.5
SW-EXP-8.X-K9
Software Image for Expressway with Encryption Version X8
N/A
21 days
No
1
1.6
LIC-EXP-RMS
Expressway Rich Media Session
N/A
21 days
No
10
1.6.0.1
CON-ECMU-LICEXPRM
SWSS UPGRADES Expressway Rich Media Session
36 month(s)
N/A
No
10
1.7
LIC-EXP-AN
Enable Advanced Networking Option
N/A
21 days
Yes
1
1.8
LIC-EXP-SERIES
Enable Expressway Series Feature Set
N/A
21 days
Yes
2
1.9
LIC-EXP-TURN
Enable TURN Relay Option
N/A
21 days
Yes
1
1.10
LIC-EXP-E-PAK
Expressway Series Expressway-E PAK
N/A
21 days
Yes
1
1.11
LIC-EXP-E
Enable Expressway-E Feature Set
N/A
21 days
Yes
1
1.12
LIC-EXP-GW
Enable GW Feature (H323-SIP)
N/A
21 days
Yes
2
1.13
LIC-SW-EXP-K9
License Key Software Encrypted
N/A
21 days
Yes
2
>From this I received the following PAKs:
LIC-SW-EXP-K9
LIC-EXP-E-PAK
Now the first one appears to be the RELEASE key, and the second PAK is the OPTION key.
How can I assign the first PAK (LIC-SW-EXP-K9) to obtain the 2x RELEASE keys for the virtual Expressway-Core and Expressway-Edge?
I am only able to assign one Serial Number to the PAK.
In the second PAK, I get a list of options which I can assign to each device (for example 5 RMS licenses to both Expressway-C and Expressway-E).
Should I have received 2x PAKs of LIC-SW-EXP-K9? Or should it have shown QTY 2 available to assign instead of 1?
Cheers
Dana
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20150106/66345ab7/attachment.html>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list