[cisco-voip] cisco-voip Digest, Vol 141, Issue 23

[Pawlowski, Adam]

CER is not aware of multiple device ownership , it will just tick down based on the number of tracked devices regardless of CUWLs or whatever you have in place.

Adam

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net
> Sent: Sunday, July 26, 2015 12:00 PM
> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: cisco-voip Digest, Vol 141, Issue 23
> 
> Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to
> 	cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	cisco-voip-owner at puck.nether.net
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
> "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. Strange 10.x licensing issue (Rajkumar Yadav)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 16:37:39 +0000 (UTC)
> From: Rajkumar Yadav <rajkumaryadav at y7mail.com>
> To: "erickbee at gmail.com" <erickbee at gmail.com>,  "ryanhuff at outlook.com"
> 	<ryanhuff at outlook.com>
> Cc: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: [cisco-voip] Strange 10.x licensing issue
> Message-ID:
> 	<763422359.2247360.1437842259916.JavaMail.yahoo at mail.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> Hi Ryan,
> 
> If one TP end point is configured in CUCM it does change the license
> geometry.
> The TP room license covers both the TP device and phone that is registered
> to CUCM, only if the owner user id is same for both.
> If owner user id differ, then two separate license are required one for TP
> device which would TP room license and for phone it would be UCL enhanced.
> 
> Refer the below link for more detail.
> Features and Services Guide for Cisco Unified Communications Manager,
> Release 10.0(1) - Licensing [Cisco Unified Communications Manager Version
> 10.0]
> 
> | ? |
> | ? |  | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
> | Features and Services Guide for Cisco Unified Communicat...Features
> | and Services Guide for Cisco Unified Communications Manager, Release
> | 10.0(1) -Licensing |  | View on www.cisco.com | Preview by Yahoo |  |
> | ? |
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> TelePresence Room License
> Multi-purpose and immersive TelePresence devices are licensed under a
> separate device license type that is called the TelePresence Room license.
> The TelePresence Room license covers both the TelePresence device and
> phone that is registered to?Cisco Unified Communications Manager, only if
> the same userid is entered as the OwnerUserID field for the TelePresence
> device and the phone. If the same userid is not entered as OwnerUserID for
> both the TelePresense device and the phone, then the devices are not
> associated and two licenses are required: one TelePresence Room license
> for the device and one Enhanced UCL for the phone. The TelePresence touch
> device does not register to the?Cisco Unified Communications Manager, and
> therefore does not require a separate license or the OwnerUserID
> association.
> 
> Regards,Raaj.
> 
> Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 23:14:33 -0500
> From: Erick <erickbee at gmail.com>
> To: Ryan Huff <ryanhuff at outlook.com>
> Cc: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Strange 10.x licensing issue
> Message-ID: <C1976E28-AFD7-4CAA-AC82-543319E2A561 at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> I haven't seen messaging licenses change for a device in cucm yet ... Now
> will need to look closer.
> 
> But I have seen CER licenses decrease when a owner is set? same on
> multiple devices in cucm . Still need to dig into that to get
> understanding of why...
> 
> Up until i saw that, I thought each product type license was not tied to
> other types. Have not found much in docs yet on this.
> 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> > On Jul 24, 2015, at 10:47 AM, Ryan Huff <ryanhuff at outlook.com> wrote:
> >?
> > Had a healthy, licensed 5 node cluster. Some Telepresence units were
> added and that put the PLM out of compliance, clearly. So the TP licenses
> were added (using the built in auto-pak fill tool)and that brought the TP
> license shortage back into compliance BUT put basic messaging, essential
> and enhanced licensing out of compliance.
> >?
> > My question is, once TP units are configured in CUCM, does that change
> the geometry of existing licensed users?
> >?
> > Thanks,
> >?
> > Ryan
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-
> voip/attachments/20150725/2e06ced5/attachment-0001.html>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Subject: Digest Footer
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> End of cisco-voip Digest, Vol 141, Issue 23
> *******************************************
>