[cisco-voip] Expressway ?'s

[Matthew Loraditch]

So this is a curiosity to me, you (Ed and Lelio) both have the same DNS servers you use internally, publically exposed and providing the DNS results for your domain both internal and external?


Matthew G. Loraditch – CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R&S, CCDA
Network Engineer
Direct Voice: 443.541.1518

Facebook<https://www.facebook.com/heliontech?ref=hl> | Twitter<https://twitter.com/HelionTech> | LinkedIn<https://www.linkedin.com/company/helion-technologies?trk=top_nav_home> | G+<https://plus.google.com/+Heliontechnologies/posts>

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ed Leatherman
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 7:48 AM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi
Cc: Cisco VOIP
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway ?'s

I'm chasing this issue now... if palo can't filter on it I might have to (short term) try having people use a separate domain name for external logins, which is also ick.


On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 10:01 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca<mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca>> wrote:
I really wish there was another option other than split DNS to get MRA working from off-premise. I mean, why rely on DNS response rather than lack of connectivity to decide which path to take? A parameter in the jabber-config.xml file could help with that.

Anyways, I know it's gonna be fun to use the workaround of configuring our edge firewall to filter out DNS responses. ugh.
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
University of Guelph

519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354<tel:519%E2%80%90824%E2%80%904120%20Ext%2056354>
lelio at uoguelph.ca<mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca>
www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs>
Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1

________________________________
From: "Charles Goldsmith" <wokka at justfamily.org<mailto:wokka at justfamily.org>>
To: "Scott Voll" <svoll.voip at gmail.com<mailto:svoll.voip at gmail.com>>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Thursday, 18 June, 2015 7:45:14 PM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway ?'s

As said by others, license is free for the MRA part, to get the free license, here is a handy blog entry : https://ciscocollab.wordpress.com/2014/02/20/how-to-get-expressway-c-and-e-licenses/

He also has entries on helping set it up, but it's pretty simple once you get in and start configuring.  Hard part is getting the certs, DNS and firewall in line :)


On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com<mailto:svoll.voip at gmail.com>> wrote:
I"m still on UC 8.6.  we are planning an upgrade to 10.x  We currently have DLU's for licensing and will be moving to CUWL Standard ( I think).

How does Expressways factor into this?

is it part of CUWL?  Is there a Cost?  What all can you do with Expressway.  What I believe I understand is that it can get your external voice and video internal.  does it replace my lan to lan connections to get an IP phone registered to CM?

Does it also do video bridging?  Example. Polycom HDX unit, cisco SX20, jabber and skype all in a single call?

TIA

Scott



_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip



--
Ed Leatherman
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20150619/d9b231ac/attachment.html>