[cisco-voip] Expressway ?'s

Ed Leatherman ealeatherman at gmail.com
Fri Jun 19 08:01:03 EDT 2015


That would be another way around it, but no way am I running my own DNS
server - and pretty much any of our staff nets could potentially use Jabber
so they'd all have to funnel through that to do service discovery (or hard
code it, which is another support mess of a different sort)

On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 7:57 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:

> The other option is to create another DNS server that responds to your
> voice domain requests then forwards all other requests to your main system.
> Update the networks that will use jabber to point to those.
>
> Again, not long term.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jun 19, 2015, at 7:48 AM, Ed Leatherman <ealeatherman at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I'm chasing this issue now... if palo can't filter on it I might have to
> (short term) try having people use a separate domain name for external
> logins, which is also ick.
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 10:01 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
> wrote:
>
>> I really wish there was another option other than split DNS to get MRA
>> working from off-premise. I mean, why rely on DNS response rather than lack
>> of connectivity to decide which path to take? A parameter in the
>> jabber-config.xml file could help with that.
>>
>> Anyways, I know it's gonna be fun to use the workaround of configuring
>> our edge firewall to filter out DNS responses. ugh.
>>
>> ---
>> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
>> Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
>> Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
>> University of Guelph
>>
>> 519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354
>> lelio at uoguelph.ca
>> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
>> Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
>> Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *From: *"Charles Goldsmith" <wokka at justfamily.org>
>> *To: *"Scott Voll" <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
>> *Cc: *cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> *Sent: *Thursday, 18 June, 2015 7:45:14 PM
>> *Subject: *Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway ?'s
>>
>>
>> As said by others, license is free for the MRA part, to get the free
>> license, here is a handy blog entry :
>> https://ciscocollab.wordpress.com/2014/02/20/how-to-get-expressway-c-and-e-licenses/
>>
>>
>> He also has entries on helping set it up, but it's pretty simple once you
>> get in and start configuring.  Hard part is getting the certs, DNS and
>> firewall in line :)
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I"m still on UC 8.6.  we are planning an upgrade to 10.x  We currently
>>> have DLU's for licensing and will be moving to CUWL Standard ( I think).
>>>
>>> How does Expressways factor into this?
>>>
>>> is it part of CUWL?  Is there a Cost?  What all can you do with
>>> Expressway.  What I believe I understand is that it can get your external
>>> voice and video internal.  does it replace my lan to lan connections to get
>>> an IP phone registered to CM?
>>>
>>> Does it also do video bridging?  Example. Polycom HDX unit, cisco SX20,
>>> jabber and skype all in a single call?
>>>
>>> TIA
>>>
>>> Scott
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Ed Leatherman
>
>


-- 
Ed Leatherman
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20150619/6bf47325/attachment.html>


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list