[cisco-voip] CUCM Cluster Redundancy

[Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman]

Hi Nizar,
          This is what I’m asking about, the client suggested this approach and I was asking about the pros and cons for such approach.



Best Regards

Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman
Senior Network Engineer


From: Nazar Shabour [mailto:nizarshabour at gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 5:57 PM
To: Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM Cluster Redundancy

hi

You mean you wan t to have 2 pubs in one cluster ?!! ? What is the benefit of this machine.?

regards



On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman <Ahmed.Rahman at bmbgroup.com<mailto:Ahmed.Rahman at bmbgroup.com>> wrote:
Hi All,
          I have a UC cluster V10.5 on 2 UCS Blade servers having 1 Pub and 4 Subs, and I’d like to ask if there is any need or benefit from having a cold standby virtual machine for the Pub server (a replicated VM for the Pub which is turned off to backup Pub functionality in case of Pub failure), and also if the license will be valid on this cold standby VM for the Pub so that if the main Pub fails and we turned on the cold standby Pub VM everything will be fine and the operation continues normally.

Waiting your feedback.


Best Regards

Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman
Senior Network Engineer

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20150320/2c0aa239/attachment.html>