[cisco-voip] Expressway-E Public or Private Certificate?

[Kevin Przybylowski]

I think this info is out there – what isn’t is the firmware needed on the endpoints!  I’ve had no luck acquiring them.

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ryan Ratliff (rratliff)
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 9:47 AM
To: Brian Meade; Anthony Holloway
Cc: cisco-voip voyp list
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway-E Public or Private Certificate?

DX, 88XX, 78XX.  This should already be in the VCS docs for 8.5 so hopefully I’m not getting myself in trouble :)

Yes, I’m presenting the UCM security session at CLUS this year.  My first time presenting so be nice if you come :)

-Ryan

On Mar 26, 2015, at 5:33 PM, Brian Meade <bmeade90 at vt.edu<mailto:bmeade90 at vt.edu>> wrote:

8800 series I believe are on the short list right now.  May even already have the test firmware released.

On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Anthony Holloway <avholloway+cisco-voip at gmail.com<mailto:avholloway+cisco-voip at gmail.com>> wrote:
Ryan,
Just to be clear, by Desktop Endpoints you mean DX endpoints, correct?

PS I see you're presenting at CLUS.  Can't wait to attend your session(s)!

On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:01 PM Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) <rratliff at cisco.com<mailto:rratliff at cisco.com>> wrote:
This is somewhat optional today with TC endpoints and Jabber only supporting MRA.  It will become mandatory when desktop endpoints start supporting MRA in the very near future.

-Ryan

On Mar 26, 2015, at 12:45 PM, Brian Meade <bmeade90 at vt.edu<mailto:bmeade90 at vt.edu>> wrote:

I think it was supposed to be "that" rather than "than".
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Anthony Holloway <avholloway+cisco-voip at gmail.com<mailto:avholloway+cisco-voip at gmail.com>> wrote:
Dennis, I re-read your reply several times and I cannot make sense of it.

Are you saying that GoDaddy is the only CA which will work with Expressway-E and MRA?

On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:16 AM Heim, Dennis <Dennis.Heim at wwt.com<mailto:Dennis.Heim at wwt.com>> wrote:
Expressway should be a public certificate. Reports from others than goDaddy causes problems.

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814<tel:%2B1%20314-212-1814>
<image001.png><https://twitter.com/CollabSensei>
<image002.png><image003.png><tel:+13142121814><image004.png>
"Innovation happens on project squared" -- http://www.projectsquared.com<http://www.projectsquared.com/>

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting Room<https://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim>



From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net>] On Behalf Of bertacco.alessandro at alice.it<mailto:bertacco.alessandro at alice.it>
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 12:12 PM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Expressway-E Public or Private Certificate?

Hi Guys,
   I've already read all Cisco Documentation about Certificate to load on the Expressway infrastructure.

For the Expressway-C I'll use private certificate signed by internal CA.


But what about for the Expressway-E?

Thank you

Regards

Alessandro
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20150327/e85a312a/attachment.html>