[cisco-voip] CUBE and LTI for MTPs

Anthony Holloway avholloway+cisco-voip at gmail.com
Mon Mar 30 13:21:20 EDT 2015


Oooo, good question Brian.  It's my understanding that in order for the
below specific call flow to work, an MTP is required for DTMF inter-working
of inband to out-of-band.

PSTN Caller Pushes DTMF ---> ITSP Delivers RFC2833 ---> CUBE Delivers OOB
---> CUCM Devlier OOB ---> UCCX CTI Port Receives OOB

Is that not the case?

On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 12:01 PM Brian Meade <bmeade90 at vt.edu> wrote:

> What are you trying to accomplish with the MTP that can't already be
> accomplished with media flow-through and dtmf-relay?
>
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Anthony Holloway <
> avholloway+cisco-voip at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> I know the name itself, LTI, includes the word transcoding, but I'm just
>> double checking that this will or will not work for registering an MTP on
>> the CUBE.  All roads are leading me to the answer, but it just seems like a
>> huge miss on Cisco's part to not allow us to register MTPs as well as XCODE
>> via the LTI method.
>>
>> This works for me:
>> dspfarm profile 1 transcode
>>  codec g711ulaw
>>  codec g729ar8
>>  max sessions 1
>>  assoc app cube
>>  no shut
>> !
>>
>> This does not work for me (it hangs on associating to cube app):
>> dapfarm profile 2 mtp
>>  codec g711ulaw
>>  max sessions software 1
>>  assoc app cube
>>  no shut
>> !
>>
>> I have the required dspfarm and mode border-element commands, and
>> rebooted after as well.
>>
>> Seems like with the standard requirement of rfc2833 on SIP trunks to the
>> ITPS, and CTI apps in the network (I'm looking at you UCCX), MTPs play a
>> large role in the success of SIP trunking for customers, and yet I cannot
>> even register them locally with the LTI.
>>
>> I do have a fallback plan, so I'm not stuck.  I'm just looking for the
>> optimal design scenario.  In my order of preference I would like to go:
>>
>> 1. LTI
>> 2. SCCP via Telephony Service
>> 3. SCCP via CUCM
>>
>> Would you rank them differently?
>>
>> Thanks for your input in advance.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20150330/5e5bf473/attachment.html>


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list