[cisco-voip] cisco-voip Digest | VG310/320/350 config

[Matthew Loraditch]

From a paper license standpoint they are supposed to, but if they are configured as MGCP they don’t use a license.
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/10_0_1/ccmfeat/CUCM_BK_F3AC1C0F_00_cucm-features-services-guide-100/CUCM_BK_F3AC1C0F_00_cucm-features-services-guide-100_chapter_0100101.html#CUCM_RF_U75FBF1E_00

Scroll down to see the note under that section.
Matthew G. Loraditch – CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R&S, CCDA
Network Engineer
Direct Voice: 443.541.1518

Facebook<https://www.facebook.com/heliontech?ref=hl> | Twitter<https://twitter.com/HelionTech> | LinkedIn<https://www.linkedin.com/company/helion-technologies?trk=top_nav_home> | G+<https://plus.google.com/+Heliontechnologies/posts>

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Charles Goldsmith
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 8:39 AM
To: Lokesh Lal
Cc: voip puck; Lokesh lal
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] cisco-voip Digest | VG310/320/350 config

This is on a 10.5 system: http://i.imgur.com/8Vp2oOR.png

We have a vg350, vg320, vg310 and three vg224's all configured.  We also have 285 phones configured, about half do not have users associated due to public space phones.

I'm not seeing the license requirement here.

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 1:34 AM, Lokesh Lal <lokesh_488 at yahoo.co.in<mailto:lokesh_488 at yahoo.co.in>> wrote:
If u check cucm 9 and above , each port/analog requires essential ucl licence.

Check utilisation report


Sent from Samsung Mobile



-------- Original message --------
From: Charles Goldsmith <wokka at justfamily.org<mailto:wokka at justfamily.org>>
Date: 26/05/2015 22:35 (GMT+05:30)
To: Lokesh Lal <lokesh_488 at yahoo.co.in<mailto:lokesh_488 at yahoo.co.in>>
Cc: Lokesh lal <lokesh488 at gmail.com<mailto:lokesh488 at gmail.com>>,voip puck <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] cisco-voip Digest | VG310/320/350 config

I don't think there are any licensing associated with it, I think when you purchase the VG, it's licensed there, and there is nothing to load or track.  Nothing we had to do on CUCM either, just like the VG224.

On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Lokesh Lal <lokesh_488 at yahoo.co.in<mailto:lokesh_488 at yahoo.co.in>> wrote:
Hi Charles,

What additional licenses are required? We need to deploy as SCCP/MGCP with CUCM 9.1 and 10.5.

Only 1 essential UCL license per port or any license enablement on IOS gateway?

Kind Regards,
Lokesh

________________________________
From: Charles Goldsmith <wokka at justfamily.org<mailto:wokka at justfamily.org>>
To: Lokesh lal <lokesh488 at gmail.com<mailto:lokesh488 at gmail.com>>
Cc: voip puck <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>>
Sent: Tuesday, 26 May 2015 10:25 PM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] cisco-voip Digest | VG310/320/350 config

They configure the same as say the vg224, other than they have the ability to have additional modules installed.  I have not used that latter function, but just configuring them as analog gateways.

On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 7:56 PM, Lokesh lal <lokesh488 at gmail.com<mailto:lokesh488 at gmail.com>> wrote:

Hi

We have been assigned to deploy Analog gateway of series (VG310/ 320/35). However i am not able to find any sample config for the same.
Regards,
Lokesh

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20150528/2da74793/attachment.html>