[cisco-voip] CUCM Upgrade failure...

Jonathan Charles jonvoip at gmail.com
Sun Nov 15 23:43:49 EST 2015


OK, a reboot of CPCD got it passed that error...


Jonathan

On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Jonathan Charles <jonvoip at gmail.com> wrote:

> Yeah, the error I am getting is:
>
> 1 nodes(s) in Export task action ID #1127... on the Publisher...
>
> I will try rebooting everything...
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 9:35 PM, Ryan Huff <ryanhuff at outlook.com> wrote:
>
>> Looks healthy ...
>>
>> I recall trying PCD once and I hit really strange issues too. For that
>> upgrade, I ultimately abandoned PCD and built new VMs with the Answer File
>> Generator then a DRS backup/restore.
>>
>> Not sure where you are in your timeline or if it is that important but it
>> is definitely something I would consider. Sometimes you can spend more time
>> trying to get the silly tools to work, than to just do the work yourself.
>>
>> Google is littered with PCD weirdness; great idea of an application, just
>> not there yet IMO.
>>
>> -Ryan
>>
>>
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>> On Nov 15, 2015, at 10:19 PM, Jonathan Charles <jonvoip at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Everything looks good....
>>
>>
>> admin:utils ntp status
>> ntpd (pid 19674) is running...
>>
>>      remote           refid      st t when poll reach   delay   offset
>>  jitter
>>
>> ==============================================================================
>>  127.127.1.0     .LOCL.          10 l   21   64  377    0.000    0.000
>> 0.001
>>  10.0.31.2       10.0.31.3        3 u  175 1024  377    0.635   -5.771
>> 2.042
>> *10.0.31.3       129.6.15.29      2 u  970 1024  377    0.510  -11.340
>> 0.449
>>  10.1.31.2       10.0.31.3        3 u  490 1024  377    0.850   -9.114
>> 4.881
>> +10.1.31.3       129.6.15.29      2 u  184 1024  377    0.817   -4.085
>> 5.355
>>
>>
>> synchronised to NTP server (10.0.31.3) at stratum 3
>>    time correct to within 68 ms
>>    polling server every 1024 s
>>
>> Current time in UTC is : Mon Nov 16 03:16:14 UTC 2015
>> Current time in America/Chicago is : Sun Nov 15 21:16:14 CST 2015
>> admin:
>>
>> admin:utils diagnose module validate_network
>>
>> Log file: platform/log/diag1.log
>>
>> Starting diagnostic test(s)
>> ===========================
>> test - validate_network    : Passed
>>
>> Diagnostics Completed
>>
>> admin:#
>>
>> admin:utils dbreplication runtimestate
>>
>> DB and Replication Services: ALL RUNNING
>>
>> Cluster Replication State: Replication repair command started at:
>> 2014-06-20-23-22
>>      Replication repair command COMPLETED 541 tables processed out of 541
>>      Errors or Mismatches Were Found:
>>
>>      Use 'file view activelog
>> cm/trace/dbl/sdi/ReplicationRepair.2014_06_20_23_22_51.out' to see the
>> details
>>
>> DB Version: ccm8_6_2_20000_2
>> Number of replicated tables: 541
>>
>> Cluster Detailed View from PUB (5 Servers):
>>
>>                                 PING            REPLICATION     REPL.
>> DBver&  REPL.       REPLICATION SETUP
>> SERVER-NAME     IP ADDRESS      (msec)  RPC?    STATUS          QUEUE
>> TABLES  LOOP?       (RTMT) & details
>> -----------     ------------    ------  ----    -----------     -----
>> ------- -----       -----------------
>> IPTCMS02  10.0.126.12     0.196   Yes     Connected       0       match
>> Yes         (2) Setup Completed
>> IPTCMS01  10.0.126.11     0.151   Yes     Connected       0       match
>> Yes         (2) Setup Completed
>> IPTCMP    10.0.126.10     0.065   Yes     Connected       0       match
>> Yes         (2) PUB Setup Completed
>> IPTCMS03  10.1.126.13     0.545   Yes     Connected       0       match
>> Yes         (2) Setup Completed
>> IPTCMS04  10.1.126.14     0.527   Yes     Connected       0       match
>> Yes         (2) Setup Completed
>>
>> admin:
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Ryan Huff <ryanhuff at outlook.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Also worth noting that if CCM NTP is synchronized to a Windows server
>>> (even if it shows Stratum 3 or better); that is a problem you'll need to
>>> correct as SNTP can play hell with UCOS and do some pretty weird stuff.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Ryan
>>>
>>> On Nov 15, 2015, at 10:06 PM, Ryan Huff <ryanhuff at outlook.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> If the FROM CCM version was unrestricted, it would say "*Unrestricted*"
>>> after the version number on the "*Active Master Version"* line. If it
>>> does not say "*Unrestricted*", then it is the more common restricted
>>> version.
>>>
>>> As to your original issue, I would start with all the usual suspects. Is
>>> the FROM CCM cluster healthy to start with; dns, ntp, replication ... etc?
>>>
>>> From CCM:
>>>
>>> 1.) #utils diagnose module validate_network
>>>         (Should see *Passed*)
>>>
>>> 2.) #utils ntp status
>>>         (Pub should be synchronized and Strata 3 or better)
>>>
>>> 3.) #utils dbreplication runtimestate
>>>         (Should see *2 - Setup Completed* for all nodes)
>>>
>>> If PCD is moving the apps to a new platform/chassis, make sure the
>>> *target* environment can reach all the same network assets as the *from*
>>> environment.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Ryan
>>>
>>> On Nov 15, 2015, at 9:34 PM, Jonathan Charles <jonvoip at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> It just says the version number...
>>>
>>> admin:show version active
>>> Active Master Version: 8.6.2.20000-2
>>> Active Version Installed Software Options:
>>> cmterm-7942_7962-sccp.9-3-1ES27-rel.cop
>>> cmterm-devicepack8.6.2.24118-1.cop
>>> ciscocm.refresh_upgrade_v1.1.cop
>>> ciscocm.ucmap_platformconfig.cop
>>> ciscocm.migrate-export-v1.12.cop
>>> admin:
>>>
>>>
>>> Jonahan
>>>
>>> On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Ryan Huff <ryanhuff at outlook.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Did you actually dump the logs to a serial interface (curious what it
>>>> shows)?
>>>>
>>>> On the FROM CCM, goto the CLI of pub (or sub) and do a "show version
>>>> active"; it will tell you if you have the UNREST.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Ryan
>>>>
>>>> > On Nov 15, 2015, at 7:55 PM, Jonathan Charles <jonvoip at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > Using PCD on CUCM 10.5.2.11901 got the following error:
>>>> >
>>>> > <image.png>
>>>> >
>>>> > It seems to imply I am not matching restricted vs. unrestricted...
>>>> >
>>>> > Any easy way to find out?
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Jonathan
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > cisco-voip mailing list
>>>> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>>> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20151115/c72bd42c/attachment.html>


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list