[cisco-voip] CUCM Upgrade failure...

Jonathan Charles jonvoip at gmail.com
Tue Nov 17 12:06:45 EST 2015


Nope, not all good... new error... the upgrade failed so I deleted the
cluster and re-added... it finds all of the subscribers, but it times out
on the publisher....

I have verified all services are running on the Pub and it looks clean...



Jonathan

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Anthony Holloway <
avholloway+cisco-voip at gmail.com> wrote:

> Looks like you're all good now, but as a heads up to everyone else, don't
> stop at checking NTP with "utils ntp status".  You will fail to upgrade if
> your NTP configuration has an FQHN for the NTP server which begins with a
> digit.
>
> E.g., 0.pool.ntp.org
>
> You will not see the hostname in the output of "utils ntp status", as it
> will only show you the resolved IP address.  So, you will also need to
> issue a "utils ntp config" to see what value was entered by the
> administrator.
>
> This is the only defect reference I found, though my upgrade I hit it on
> was an 8.6 to 10.5 Refresh Upgrade (RU) (Not PCD).
>
> https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCtj07817
>
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 10:43 PM, Jonathan Charles <jonvoip at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> OK, a reboot of CPCD got it passed that error...
>>
>>
>> Jonathan
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Jonathan Charles <jonvoip at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Yeah, the error I am getting is:
>>>
>>> 1 nodes(s) in Export task action ID #1127... on the Publisher...
>>>
>>> I will try rebooting everything...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Jonathan
>>>
>>> On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 9:35 PM, Ryan Huff <ryanhuff at outlook.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Looks healthy ...
>>>>
>>>> I recall trying PCD once and I hit really strange issues too. For that
>>>> upgrade, I ultimately abandoned PCD and built new VMs with the Answer File
>>>> Generator then a DRS backup/restore.
>>>>
>>>> Not sure where you are in your timeline or if it is that important but
>>>> it is definitely something I would consider. Sometimes you can spend more
>>>> time trying to get the silly tools to work, than to just do the work
>>>> yourself.
>>>>
>>>> Google is littered with PCD weirdness; great idea of an application,
>>>> just not there yet IMO.
>>>>
>>>> -Ryan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>> On Nov 15, 2015, at 10:19 PM, Jonathan Charles <jonvoip at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Everything looks good....
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> admin:utils ntp status
>>>> ntpd (pid 19674) is running...
>>>>
>>>>      remote           refid      st t when poll reach   delay   offset
>>>>  jitter
>>>>
>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>>  127.127.1.0     .LOCL.          10 l   21   64  377    0.000    0.000
>>>>   0.001
>>>>  10.0.31.2       10.0.31.3        3 u  175 1024  377    0.635   -5.771
>>>>   2.042
>>>> *10.0.31.3       129.6.15.29      2 u  970 1024  377    0.510  -11.340
>>>>   0.449
>>>>  10.1.31.2       10.0.31.3        3 u  490 1024  377    0.850   -9.114
>>>>   4.881
>>>> +10.1.31.3       129.6.15.29      2 u  184 1024  377    0.817   -4.085
>>>>   5.355
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> synchronised to NTP server (10.0.31.3) at stratum 3
>>>>    time correct to within 68 ms
>>>>    polling server every 1024 s
>>>>
>>>> Current time in UTC is : Mon Nov 16 03:16:14 UTC 2015
>>>> Current time in America/Chicago is : Sun Nov 15 21:16:14 CST 2015
>>>> admin:
>>>>
>>>> admin:utils diagnose module validate_network
>>>>
>>>> Log file: platform/log/diag1.log
>>>>
>>>> Starting diagnostic test(s)
>>>> ===========================
>>>> test - validate_network    : Passed
>>>>
>>>> Diagnostics Completed
>>>>
>>>> admin:#
>>>>
>>>> admin:utils dbreplication runtimestate
>>>>
>>>> DB and Replication Services: ALL RUNNING
>>>>
>>>> Cluster Replication State: Replication repair command started at:
>>>> 2014-06-20-23-22
>>>>      Replication repair command COMPLETED 541 tables processed out of
>>>> 541
>>>>      Errors or Mismatches Were Found:
>>>>
>>>>      Use 'file view activelog
>>>> cm/trace/dbl/sdi/ReplicationRepair.2014_06_20_23_22_51.out' to see the
>>>> details
>>>>
>>>> DB Version: ccm8_6_2_20000_2
>>>> Number of replicated tables: 541
>>>>
>>>> Cluster Detailed View from PUB (5 Servers):
>>>>
>>>>                                 PING            REPLICATION     REPL.
>>>> DBver&  REPL.       REPLICATION SETUP
>>>> SERVER-NAME     IP ADDRESS      (msec)  RPC?    STATUS          QUEUE
>>>> TABLES  LOOP?       (RTMT) & details
>>>> -----------     ------------    ------  ----    -----------     -----
>>>> ------- -----       -----------------
>>>> IPTCMS02  10.0.126.12     0.196   Yes     Connected       0       match
>>>>   Yes         (2) Setup Completed
>>>> IPTCMS01  10.0.126.11     0.151   Yes     Connected       0       match
>>>>   Yes         (2) Setup Completed
>>>> IPTCMP    10.0.126.10     0.065   Yes     Connected       0       match
>>>>   Yes         (2) PUB Setup Completed
>>>> IPTCMS03  10.1.126.13     0.545   Yes     Connected       0       match
>>>>   Yes         (2) Setup Completed
>>>> IPTCMS04  10.1.126.14     0.527   Yes     Connected       0       match
>>>>   Yes         (2) Setup Completed
>>>>
>>>> admin:
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Ryan Huff <ryanhuff at outlook.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Also worth noting that if CCM NTP is synchronized to a Windows server
>>>>> (even if it shows Stratum 3 or better); that is a problem you'll need to
>>>>> correct as SNTP can play hell with UCOS and do some pretty weird stuff.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Ryan
>>>>>
>>>>> On Nov 15, 2015, at 10:06 PM, Ryan Huff <ryanhuff at outlook.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> If the FROM CCM version was unrestricted, it would say "*Unrestricted*"
>>>>> after the version number on the "*Active Master Version"* line. If it
>>>>> does not say "*Unrestricted*", then it is the more common restricted
>>>>> version.
>>>>>
>>>>> As to your original issue, I would start with all the usual suspects.
>>>>> Is the FROM CCM cluster healthy to start with; dns, ntp, replication ...
>>>>> etc?
>>>>>
>>>>> From CCM:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1.) #utils diagnose module validate_network
>>>>>         (Should see *Passed*)
>>>>>
>>>>> 2.) #utils ntp status
>>>>>         (Pub should be synchronized and Strata 3 or better)
>>>>>
>>>>> 3.) #utils dbreplication runtimestate
>>>>>         (Should see *2 - Setup Completed* for all nodes)
>>>>>
>>>>> If PCD is moving the apps to a new platform/chassis, make sure the
>>>>> *target* environment can reach all the same network assets as the
>>>>> *from* environment.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Ryan
>>>>>
>>>>> On Nov 15, 2015, at 9:34 PM, Jonathan Charles <jonvoip at gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> It just says the version number...
>>>>>
>>>>> admin:show version active
>>>>> Active Master Version: 8.6.2.20000-2
>>>>> Active Version Installed Software Options:
>>>>> cmterm-7942_7962-sccp.9-3-1ES27-rel.cop
>>>>> cmterm-devicepack8.6.2.24118-1.cop
>>>>> ciscocm.refresh_upgrade_v1.1.cop
>>>>> ciscocm.ucmap_platformconfig.cop
>>>>> ciscocm.migrate-export-v1.12.cop
>>>>> admin:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Jonahan
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Ryan Huff <ryanhuff at outlook.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Did you actually dump the logs to a serial interface (curious what it
>>>>>> shows)?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On the FROM CCM, goto the CLI of pub (or sub) and do a "show version
>>>>>> active"; it will tell you if you have the UNREST.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ryan
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > On Nov 15, 2015, at 7:55 PM, Jonathan Charles <jonvoip at gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Using PCD on CUCM 10.5.2.11901 got the following error:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > <image.png>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > It seems to imply I am not matching restricted vs. unrestricted...
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Any easy way to find out?
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Jonathan
>>>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>>>> > cisco-voip mailing list
>>>>>> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>>>>> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20151117/b7bd25bc/attachment.html>


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list