[cisco-voip] cucm 10.5 version

[Ovidiu Popa]

For it to be an SU it should have the last three digits in the range
900-999.
It's an ES :

(zzz) FCS:000, ES: 001-899, SU: 900-999


On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Ryan Huff <ryanhuff at outlook.com> wrote:

> So I imagine it is SU4 ... I was just wondering why it is not listed on
> CCO. There have been times, where a new release is listed but then removed
> due to deferment.
>
> On Sep 12, 2016, at 11:18 AM, Ovidiu Popa <ovi.popa at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> I found this in an old Cisco live presentation. HTH
>
> Numbering Convention Example
> (A.B.C.XYzzz-x)
> (A) Major version (License)
> 8.6.2.20000-2
> (B) Minor version (Long Life Release)
> 8.6.2.20000-2
> (C) Maintenance release(Patch and/or Features)
> 8.6.2.20000-2
> (X) Build (Patch)
> 8.6.2.10000-2
> 8.6.2.20000-2
> (Y) FCS:0, ESor SU: 1-9
> 8.6.2.10000-30 (FCS)
> 8.6.2.22900-1 (ESor SU look at last three digits)
> (zzz) FCS:000, ES: 001-899, SU: 900-999
> 8.6.2.20000-2 (FCS)
> 8.6.2.21001-1 (ES)
> 8.6.2.22900-1 (SU)
>
>
> Best regards,
> Ovidiu
>
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Ryan Huff <ryanhuff at outlook.com> wrote:
>
>> Just spotted 10.5.2.14060-1 on a cluster ... CCO only shows up to
>> 10.5.2.13901-2 ( 10.5(2)SU3a ). Anyone know if 10.5.2.14060-1 is a
>> deferment or an engineering special ... etc?
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>> Ryan
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20160912/c82ccad8/attachment.html>