[cisco-voip] Cisco IM & Presence 11 5.1 SU2 corrupt install with 2nd server

[Jose Colon II]

Charles I have attached a screenshot of the document sent internally to
SE's that we can share. It has the info you are asking about.

On Aug 26, 2017 2:03 PM, "Charles Goldsmith" <wokka at justfamily.org> wrote:

> Thanks for that Anthony, but something else that was in that presentation
> that I didn't know about, was the 8.6 or older installs.  If the license
> isn't migrated prior to Dec 1, the customer will have to purchase the
> licenses again when they upgrade to 9.x or higher.  Basically, license
> migrations for 8.6 and older will no longer be available after November,
> unless they have SWSS on 8.x and the slide says very few people will have
> that.
>
> On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Anthony Holloway <
> avholloway+cisco-voip at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Actually, Cisco announced CentOS as the OS for CUCM 12.0 at Cisco Live US
>> 2017.
>>
>> BRKUCC-2011 - Best Practices for Migrating Previous Versions of CUCM to
>> version 12 (2017 Las Vegas)
>> <https://www.ciscolive.com/online/connect/sessionDetail.ww?SESSION_ID=95812&backBtn=true>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 3:15 PM Brian Meade <bmeade90 at vt.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> Historically this was due to Red Hat not wanting bootable versions of
>>> their OS out there for everybody.  I think there was a plan to go to CentOS
>>> for UCOS at some point but not sure if that ever got anywhere.  That was
>>> going to allow bootables on cisoc.com again.
>>>
>>> I doubt 11.6 is on CentOS now because I would expect a refresh upgrade
>>> if so but who knows.  Maybe Red Hat changed their agreement with Cisco?
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Charles Goldsmith <
>>> wokka at justfamily.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I remember years ago Cisco starting posting bootable ISO's and then
>>>> turned around and pulled them due to issues with another department.  Here
>>>> is the relevant thread: https://puck.nether.ne
>>>> t/pipermail/cisco-voip/2010-August/015533.html  Have to read some of
>>>> the quoted messages that were not posted to the list.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Ryan Huff <ryanhuff at outlook.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The Unified Communications IM and Presence ISO is bootable I believe
>>>>> (maybe that changed?); although it's sister ISO, Unified Communications
>>>>> Manager is not.
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> *From:* cisco-voip <cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net> on behalf of
>>>>> Anthony Holloway <avholloway+cisco-voip at gmail.com>
>>>>> *Sent:* Friday, August 25, 2017 10:08 AM
>>>>> *To:* Matthew Huff; cisco-voip list
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco IM & Presence 11 5.1 SU2 corrupt
>>>>> install with 2nd server
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't have an answer for you, but you reminded me that UCCX 11.6 is
>>>>> setting the new standard for ISOs.  The UCCX 11.6 ISO on CCO for upgrading,
>>>>> is also bootable, and can be used for fresh installs as well.  Get on board
>>>>> IM&P, so people don't have to create their own bootable media.
>>>>>
>>>>> *Single ISO for Upgrades and Fresh-Install*
>>>>> *In UCCX 11.6, there is only 1 ISO released that is posted on
>>>>> Cisco.com and this ISO can be used for either an upgrade or a fresh
>>>>> install. The ISO follows the regular naming convention of UCSInstall_UCCX
>>>>> _11.6.XXXXX-XX.sgn.iso  **This ISO is provided with both boot
>>>>> options, so serves as a bootable image as well.*
>>>>> *Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/customer-collaboration/unified-contact-center-express/211582-Tech-Note-on-UCCX-11-6-Pre-Release-Commu.html
>>>>> <https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/customer-collaboration/unified-contact-center-express/211582-Tech-Note-on-UCCX-11-6-Pre-Release-Commu.html>*
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 1:13 PM Matthew Huff <mhuff at ox.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I’ve tried repeatedly to install our second IM server, and it always
>>>>>> fails with a corrupt file during post-install. I re-downloaded the ISO and
>>>>>> recreated the bootable ISO, so I don’t believe it’s a ISO issue. Anyone see
>>>>>> this?
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>>>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20170826/a93d1401/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Screenshot_20170826-140804.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 930630 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20170826/a93d1401/attachment.jpg>