[cisco-voip] CCX 9.0.2 Cant upload scripts

Tue Feb 14 12:11:16 EST 2017

Im seeing a generic error saying I cant upload scripts.  I saw a bug for 8.x but rezipping the file or rebuilding still wont work.  Server need a reboot?

  Dan Mason

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 12:00 PM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: cisco-voip Digest, Vol 160, Issue 13

Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__puck.nether.net_mailman_listinfo_cisco-2Dvoip&d=DQICAg&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=__J_mRWed6v-NS1wLqgaOEJvgtKOvHgszu8ypqZazE4&m=CP9U3t6L9c-PNA20PaKy4y_9kXyMPWu-CMVY8k4mTzs&s=OOCZoy5ttXI6Zd_bov0vjo8CSK_D9qFKtxCuAE2etaY&e=
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net

You can reach the person managing the list at
cisco-voip-owner at puck.nether.net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."

Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Teleconferencing question (Ben Amick)
   2. Upgrade knowledge (Terry Oakley)
   3. Re: Upgrade knowledge (Matthew Loraditch)
   4. CUCM 10.5.1 to 10.5.2SU4a confusion. (Mike O)
   5. Re: Teleconferencing question (NateCCIE)
   6. Re: Upgrade knowledge (Abhiram Kramadhati (akramadh))
   7. Expressway MRA design question. (Nick)
   8. Re: Expressway MRA design question. (Lelio Fulgenzi)
   9. Re: Expressway MRA design question. (mtarpey1 at optimum.net)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 17:37:19 +0000
From: Ben Amick <bamick at HumanArc.com>
To: Terry Oakley <Terry.Oakley at rdc.ab.ca>,
"cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Teleconferencing question
Message-ID:
<820C24BFE55F434C97807C60D4647ACE2FE994A1 at E2k10-MB-HT1.humanarc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Read below for my initial thoughts, but I just did a google since I went to a cisco facility the other day and saw the new cisco Telepresence ceiling mics, which are 4-pin mini jack and are compatible with even the low end video solutions such as the SX10/20, which lowers the price point of your possible video solution, and the audioscience I mention below is now EoL. (link for those curious: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.cisco.com_c_en_us_products_collateral_collaboration-2Dendpoints_telepresence-2Dmicrophones_datasheet-2Dc78-2D736073.html&d=DQICAg&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=__J_mRWed6v-NS1wLqgaOEJvgtKOvHgszu8ypqZazE4&m=CP9U3t6L9c-PNA20PaKy4y_9kXyMPWu-CMVY8k4mTzs&s=cenQeeLKMz3lt-mgtlIFycK9wUakJuUHKCBlCLNShcc&e= )

If it wasn't for the malleability of the tables, I'd suggest getting a daisy chain unit to extend out both the speaker and the microphones across a longer distance.

However, if you're going to look at teleconferencing with the possibility of video, I'd look for an C-series telepresence codec with the XLR based Audioscience ceiling microphones. The configuration of those would allow you to suspend them around the room. This would also enable you to gain much better audio quality around the room, as well as be able to properly integrate wall-mounted displays and the such and multiple video inputs.

Short of that, an MX 7/800 series (or SX series if you already have displays) unit could enable you for videoconferencing with less facility tie-in, and the higher end units also support the XLR based audioscience mics.

Ben Amick
Telecom Analyst

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Terry Oakley
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 11:55 AM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Teleconferencing question

We have a board room 25' by 40', that we currently have an 8831 conferencing unit in with the two external mics.   The unit works well but with only the two mics does not adequately cover the room.   Do any of you have suggestions as to how we can add the necessary mic coverage into the room but at the same time keep it neat and tidy?   The room is often use for our College's Board meeting and will have 18 to 30 guests invited to the meeting.   The setup is 12 tables on castors, that are arranged in an oval but can be separated or arranged differently for other events.

We do have WebEx, IM&Presence available if something there would allow us to provide a better teleconferencing solution.   I am think we should just do a full blown conferencing suite, video and tele but want to know if there are other solutions that I have not seen or more likely thought of.

Thanks

Terry

Terry Oakley
Telecommunications Coordinator | Information Technology Services Red Deer College |100 College Blvd. | Box 5005 | Red Deer | Alberta | T4N 5H5
work (403) 342-3521   |  FAX (403) 343-4034

Confidentiality Note: This message is intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy. Thank you
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__puck.nether.net_pipermail_cisco-2Dvoip_attachments_20170213_fa1a7fbc_attachment-2D0001.html&d=DQICAg&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=__J_mRWed6v-NS1wLqgaOEJvgtKOvHgszu8ypqZazE4&m=CP9U3t6L9c-PNA20PaKy4y_9kXyMPWu-CMVY8k4mTzs&s=huYOKV8BPCbR_JOKkcRf0S5HiqCr-8yXLseujdivFiY&e= >

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 12:14:30 -0700
From: Terry Oakley <Terry.Oakley at rdc.ab.ca>
To: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Upgrade knowledge
Message-ID:
<C53F9D4DA50C854F90C655DBBC63D40C1CAD0A938D at RDCEXMAIL1.RDCSRVCS.ADS>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Currently we are CUCM 10.5.2.11900-3 and UCCX 10.6.1.10000-39.     We would like to upgrade to CUCM 11.x but for now stay at UCCX 10.6.1 as we want to keep CAD going for a while yet before we have to move to Finesse.  Possible?
We also have IM&P in our environment along with WebEx.

Thoughts and got ya's....

Thanks

Terry

Terry Oakley
Telecommunications Coordinator | Information Technology Services Red Deer College |100 College Blvd. | Box 5005 | Red Deer | Alberta | T4N 5H5
work (403) 342-3521   |  FAX (403) 343-4034

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__puck.nether.net_pipermail_cisco-2Dvoip_attachments_20170213_4dc326f6_attachment-2D0001.html&d=DQICAg&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=__J_mRWed6v-NS1wLqgaOEJvgtKOvHgszu8ypqZazE4&m=CP9U3t6L9c-PNA20PaKy4y_9kXyMPWu-CMVY8k4mTzs&s=1IcAS6aFwVddWfT6iCj-Ownx01Xq8VrgyHkBqOP8u0o&e= >

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 19:32:53 +0000
From: Matthew Loraditch <MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com>
To: Terry Oakley <Terry.Oakley at rdc.ab.ca>,
"cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Upgrade knowledge
Message-ID:
<BN3PR08MB19084C77397B39A570623C92B3590 at BN3PR08MB1908.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__docwiki.cisco.com_wiki_Unified-5FCCX-5FSoftware-5FCompatibility-5FMatrix-5Ffor-5F10.6-281-29&d=DQICAg&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=__J_mRWed6v-NS1wLqgaOEJvgtKOvHgszu8ypqZazE4&m=CP9U3t6L9c-PNA20PaKy4y_9kXyMPWu-CMVY8k4mTzs&s=pGFMftoHICy1tTsYf23r0zwkmWmdwRaApYAdlrhwSHk&e=
There is a cop required or upgrade to SU2 but it will work up to the  latest CUCM release.

Matthew G. Loraditch - CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R&S, CCDA Network Engineer Direct Voice: 443.541.1518

Facebook<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.facebook.com_heliontech-3Fref-3Dhl&d=DQICAg&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=__J_mRWed6v-NS1wLqgaOEJvgtKOvHgszu8ypqZazE4&m=CP9U3t6L9c-PNA20PaKy4y_9kXyMPWu-CMVY8k4mTzs&s=Hwr__yOYGo-majsS4x6T8v3X5-n-awBujcGEepiBAY8&e= > | Twitter<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__twitter.com_HelionTech&d=DQICAg&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=__J_mRWed6v-NS1wLqgaOEJvgtKOvHgszu8ypqZazE4&m=CP9U3t6L9c-PNA20PaKy4y_9kXyMPWu-CMVY8k4mTzs&s=Kwb6K-RGaQQGf32k6f87CvIpsJ09PfRdin8aUJ7oORI&e= > | LinkedIn<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.linkedin.com_company_helion-2Dtechnologies-3Ftrk-3Dtop-5Fnav-5Fhome&d=DQICAg&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=__J_mRWed6v-NS1wLqgaOEJvgtKOvHgszu8ypqZazE4&m=CP9U3t6L9c-PNA20PaKy4y_9kXyMPWu-CMVY8k4mTzs&s=g7lHYyAeQOhUUEoOv1TxR4fgyEbQ43YQPsMEHuGN5o0&e= > | G+<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__plus.google.com_-2BHeli
 ontechnologies_posts&d=DQICAg&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=__J_mRWed6v-NS1wLqgaOEJvgtKOvHgszu8ypqZazE4&m=CP9U3t6L9c-PNA20PaKy4y_9kXyMPWu-CMVY8k4mTzs&s=RCAxWmwGpZ8PCKYfq-wI7-eoJgzVrGeMp1VHj2h8UT8&e= >

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Terry Oakley
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 2:15 PM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Upgrade knowledge

Currently we are CUCM 10.5.2.11900-3 and UCCX 10.6.1.10000-39.     We would like to upgrade to CUCM 11.x but for now stay at UCCX 10.6.1 as we want to keep CAD going for a while yet before we have to move to Finesse.  Possible?
We also have IM&P in our environment along with WebEx.

Thoughts and got ya's....

Thanks

Terry

Terry Oakley
Telecommunications Coordinator | Information Technology Services Red Deer College |100 College Blvd. | Box 5005 | Red Deer | Alberta | T4N 5H5
work (403) 342-3521   |  FAX (403) 343-4034

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__puck.nether.net_pipermail_cisco-2Dvoip_attachments_20170213_05d4201d_attachment-2D0001.html&d=DQICAg&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=__J_mRWed6v-NS1wLqgaOEJvgtKOvHgszu8ypqZazE4&m=CP9U3t6L9c-PNA20PaKy4y_9kXyMPWu-CMVY8k4mTzs&s=Y576-KttwoD-FvVRulhRHbSrB20Jj-XpspJSgDNKwSM&e= >

------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 21:04:14 +0000
From: Mike O <MikeeO at msn.com>
To: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [cisco-voip] CUCM 10.5.1 to 10.5.2SU4a confusion.
Message-ID:
<BN6PR18MB096173C0DF702F9ABCCA1906C5590 at BN6PR18MB0961.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

I'm a little confused on the release notes. Is this considered an L2 upgrade or a refresh?  I took a snippet from the notes:

Refresh Upgrades to Cisco Unified Communications Manager Release 10.5(2)SU2+ Currently, the Upgrade Guide for Cisco Unified Communications Manager and IM and Presence Service instructs administrators performing a refresh upgrade of Cisco Unified Communications Manager nodes that they must both upgrade and switch versions on the publisher node before they begin to upgrade subscriber nodes.
As of Cisco Unified Communications Manager Release 10.5(2)SU2 and higher, administrators have the option of holding off switching versions until after all cluster nodes are upgraded. For this case, the revised order would be:

  1.  Upgrade the Unified Communications Manager publisher node.
  2.  Upgrade the Unified Communications Manager subscriber nodes.
  3.  Switch the publisher node to the upgraded partition.
  4.  Switch the subscriber nodes to the upgraded partition.
Note

________________________________
You can switch the subscriber nodes to the upgraded partition either all at once, or one at a time, depending on your site requirements.
________________________________

For Cisco Unified Communications Manager Release 10.5(2)SU2 and higher, administrators can apply this optional version switching sequence to the Refresh Upgrade task lists in the "Upgrades Overview" chapter of the Upgrade Guide for Cisco Unified Communications Manager and IM and Presence Service.

Thanks,

Mike
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__puck.nether.net_pipermail_cisco-2Dvoip_attachments_20170213_33599895_attachment-2D0001.html&d=DQICAg&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=__J_mRWed6v-NS1wLqgaOEJvgtKOvHgszu8ypqZazE4&m=CP9U3t6L9c-PNA20PaKy4y_9kXyMPWu-CMVY8k4mTzs&s=si6FTBQbbpxf4cWSctc3Iee_ktCSTltm_PoKnIq3m0w&e= >

------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 17:16:09 -0700
From: NateCCIE <nateccie at gmail.com>
To: Ben Amick <bamick at HumanArc.com>
Cc: Terry Oakley <Terry.Oakley at rdc.ab.ca>,
"cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Teleconferencing question
Message-ID: <5B51CDFA-E8A2-48FC-A2E8-B5E5792EF14E at gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Look at the shire micro flex advance ceiling mount.

https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.shure.com_americas_microflex-2Dadvance&d=DQICAg&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=__J_mRWed6v-NS1wLqgaOEJvgtKOvHgszu8ypqZazE4&m=CP9U3t6L9c-PNA20PaKy4y_9kXyMPWu-CMVY8k4mTzs&s=vRoxAb-6O-RnfX6r0ed_IrVaeNAsPibbmJl-fSbPuVs&e=

Watch the demo videos and be amazed.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Feb 13, 2017, at 10:37 AM, Ben Amick <bamick at HumanArc.com> wrote:
>
> Read below for my initial thoughts, but I just did a google since I
> went to a cisco facility the other day and saw the new cisco
> Telepresence ceiling mics, which are 4-pin mini jack and are
> compatible with even the low end video solutions such as the SX10/20,
> which lowers the price point of your possible video solution, and the
> audioscience I mention below is now EoL. (link for those curious:
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.cisco.com_c_en
> _us_products_collateral_collaboration-2Dendpoints_telepresence-2Dmicro
> phones_datasheet-2Dc78-2D736073.html&d=DQICAg&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jX
> rwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=__J_mRWed6v-NS1wLqgaOEJvgtKOvHgszu8ypqZazE4&m=
> CP9U3t6L9c-PNA20PaKy4y_9kXyMPWu-CMVY8k4mTzs&s=cenQeeLKMz3lt-mgtlIFycK9
> wUakJuUHKCBlCLNShcc&e= )
>
> If it wasn?t for the malleability of the tables, I?d suggest getting a daisy chain unit to extend out both the speaker and the microphones across a longer distance.
>
> However, if you?re going to look at teleconferencing with the possibility of video, I?d look for an C-series telepresence codec with the XLR based Audioscience ceiling microphones. The configuration of those would allow you to suspend them around the room. This would also enable you to gain much better audio quality around the room, as well as be able to properly integrate wall-mounted displays and the such and multiple video inputs.
>
> Short of that, an MX 7/800 series (or SX series if you already have displays) unit could enable you for videoconferencing with less facility tie-in, and the higher end units also support the XLR based audioscience mics.
>
> Ben Amick
> Telecom Analyst
>
> From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf
> Of Terry Oakley
> Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 11:55 AM
> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [cisco-voip] Teleconferencing question
>
> We have a board room 25? by 40?, that we currently have an 8831 conferencing unit in with the two external mics.   The unit works well but with only the two mics does not adequately cover the room.   Do any of you have suggestions as to how we can add the necessary mic coverage into the room but at the same time keep it neat and tidy?   The room is often use for our College?s Board meeting and will have 18 to 30 guests invited to the meeting.   The setup is 12 tables on castors, that are arranged in an oval but can be separated or arranged differently for other events.
>
> We do have WebEx, IM&Presence available if something there would allow us to provide a better teleconferencing solution.   I am think we should just do a full blown conferencing suite, video and tele but want to know if there are other solutions that I have not seen or more likely thought of.
>
> Thanks
>
> Terry
>
> Terry Oakley
> Telecommunications Coordinator | Information Technology Services Red
> Deer College |100 College Blvd. | Box 5005 | Red Deer | Alberta | T4N 5H5
> work (403) 342-3521   |  FAX (403) 343-4034
>
>
> Confidentiality Note: This message is intended for use only by the
> individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
> information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from
> disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not
> the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for
> delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby
> notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
> communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
> communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and
> destroy the material in its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy.
> Thank you _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__puck.nether.net_m
> ailman_listinfo_cisco-2Dvoip&d=DQICAg&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5
> A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=__J_mRWed6v-NS1wLqgaOEJvgtKOvHgszu8ypqZazE4&m=CP9U3t6L
> 9c-PNA20PaKy4y_9kXyMPWu-CMVY8k4mTzs&s=OOCZoy5ttXI6Zd_bov0vjo8CSK_D9qFK
> txCuAE2etaY&e=
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__puck.nether.net_pipermail_cisco-2Dvoip_attachments_20170213_3d9578ea_attachment-2D0001.html&d=DQICAg&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=__J_mRWed6v-NS1wLqgaOEJvgtKOvHgszu8ypqZazE4&m=CP9U3t6L9c-PNA20PaKy4y_9kXyMPWu-CMVY8k4mTzs&s=AifYbLI03T8nbMJAJA58uxfZyPPYx3atwX01iRjMGUA&e= >

------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 01:10:14 +0000
From: "Abhiram Kramadhati (akramadh)" <akramadh at cisco.com>
To: Matthew Loraditch <MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com>, Terry
Oakley <Terry.Oakley at rdc.ab.ca>, "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net"
<cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Upgrade knowledge
Message-ID: <68EDB006-EA80-48FD-8277-E1AB1FEB54D9 at cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Would recommend going to SU2 since mixed mode is available by default, no cop for CUCM compatbility and also to ensure that any new defect fixes from the BU is available since defects fixes will only go into 10.6(1)SU2 (latest SU).

Regards,
Abhiram Kramadhati
Technical Solutions Manager, CCBU
CCIE Collaboration # 40065

From: cisco-voip <cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net> on behalf of Matthew Loraditch <MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com>
Date: Tuesday, 14 February 2017 at 6:32 AM
To: Terry Oakley <Terry.Oakley at rdc.ab.ca>, "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Upgrade knowledge

https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__docwiki.cisco.com_wiki_Unified-5FCCX-5FSoftware-5FCompatibility-5FMatrix-5Ffor-5F10.6-281-29&d=DQICAg&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=__J_mRWed6v-NS1wLqgaOEJvgtKOvHgszu8ypqZazE4&m=CP9U3t6L9c-PNA20PaKy4y_9kXyMPWu-CMVY8k4mTzs&s=pGFMftoHICy1tTsYf23r0zwkmWmdwRaApYAdlrhwSHk&e=
There is a cop required or upgrade to SU2 but it will work up to the  latest CUCM release.

Matthew G. Loraditch ? CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R&S, CCDA Network Engineer Direct Voice: 443.541.1518

Facebook<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.facebook.com_heliontech-3Fref-3Dhl&d=DQICAg&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=__J_mRWed6v-NS1wLqgaOEJvgtKOvHgszu8ypqZazE4&m=CP9U3t6L9c-PNA20PaKy4y_9kXyMPWu-CMVY8k4mTzs&s=Hwr__yOYGo-majsS4x6T8v3X5-n-awBujcGEepiBAY8&e= > | Twitter<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__twitter.com_HelionTech&d=DQICAg&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=__J_mRWed6v-NS1wLqgaOEJvgtKOvHgszu8ypqZazE4&m=CP9U3t6L9c-PNA20PaKy4y_9kXyMPWu-CMVY8k4mTzs&s=Kwb6K-RGaQQGf32k6f87CvIpsJ09PfRdin8aUJ7oORI&e= > | LinkedIn<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.linkedin.com_company_helion-2Dtechnologies-3Ftrk-3Dtop-5Fnav-5Fhome&d=DQICAg&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=__J_mRWed6v-NS1wLqgaOEJvgtKOvHgszu8ypqZazE4&m=CP9U3t6L9c-PNA20PaKy4y_9kXyMPWu-CMVY8k4mTzs&s=g7lHYyAeQOhUUEoOv1TxR4fgyEbQ43YQPsMEHuGN5o0&e= > | G+<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__plus.google.com_-2BHeli
 ontechnologies_posts&d=DQICAg&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=__J_mRWed6v-NS1wLqgaOEJvgtKOvHgszu8ypqZazE4&m=CP9U3t6L9c-PNA20PaKy4y_9kXyMPWu-CMVY8k4mTzs&s=RCAxWmwGpZ8PCKYfq-wI7-eoJgzVrGeMp1VHj2h8UT8&e= >

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Terry Oakley
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 2:15 PM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Upgrade knowledge

Currently we are CUCM 10.5.2.11900-3 and UCCX 10.6.1.10000-39.     We would like to upgrade to CUCM 11.x but for now stay at UCCX 10.6.1 as we want to keep CAD going for a while yet before we have to move to Finesse.  Possible?
We also have IM&P in our environment along with WebEx.

Thoughts and got ya?s?.

Thanks

Terry

Terry Oakley
Telecommunications Coordinator | Information Technology Services Red Deer College |100 College Blvd. | Box 5005 | Red Deer | Alberta | T4N 5H5
work (403) 342-3521   |  FAX (403) 343-4034

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__puck.nether.net_pipermail_cisco-2Dvoip_attachments_20170214_33b907e0_attachment-2D0001.html&d=DQICAg&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=__J_mRWed6v-NS1wLqgaOEJvgtKOvHgszu8ypqZazE4&m=CP9U3t6L9c-PNA20PaKy4y_9kXyMPWu-CMVY8k4mTzs&s=QTh1kOE9gHxrtsY6JVubMkSFPN7c5F8uBayQYkq85uQ&e= >

------------------------------

Message: 7
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 16:10:06 +0000
From: Nick <csvoip at googlemail.com>
To: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Expressway MRA design question.
Message-ID:
<CAGJstUJrtV8sRJRb9A2==3OF4tiRD=YQMmFMnqWe40VDCqZExg at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

I have a customer who doesn't want the Expressway E FQDN to be put into the public DNS SRV record and wants to use an alias such as an a record in the collab-edge SRV which points to the public IP, I cant seem to find if this is supported or not can anyone confirm if this is supported?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__puck.nether.net_pipermail_cisco-2Dvoip_attachments_20170214_6ccf2515_attachment-2D0001.html&d=DQICAg&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=__J_mRWed6v-NS1wLqgaOEJvgtKOvHgszu8ypqZazE4&m=CP9U3t6L9c-PNA20PaKy4y_9kXyMPWu-CMVY8k4mTzs&s=HbTfYu0QFaaACakezyo_rQw-fr0t_tQ8LFbpDrIH9sM&e= >

------------------------------

Message: 8
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 16:27:21 +0000
From: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
To: "voyp list, cisco-voip" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway MRA design question.
Message-ID:
<YTOPR01MB025126F21B3179841E637538AC580 at YTOPR01MB0251.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

we tried this and it didn't work out so well. we didn't try to fix things because we were on a limited time frame. we also ran into an issue where the hostname has to match the outside name/certificate details as well as matching the service discovery domain).

so, where we initially had https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__hostname.dept.acme.com&d=DQICAg&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=__J_mRWed6v-NS1wLqgaOEJvgtKOvHgszu8ypqZazE4&m=CP9U3t6L9c-PNA20PaKy4y_9kXyMPWu-CMVY8k4mTzs&s=YPOdbXhhZ7ub_DDPfWFO22yh3oBmFWsYXeBRyx47N54&e=  we had to modify it to https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__servicename.servicedomain.acme.com&d=DQICAg&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=__J_mRWed6v-NS1wLqgaOEJvgtKOvHgszu8ypqZazE4&m=CP9U3t6L9c-PNA20PaKy4y_9kXyMPWu-CMVY8k4mTzs&s=eiG9YeKpxBEa08csIC1refuQlh36WsYs9m40C9JEa1U&e= .

then, in the split view dns, you resolve https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__servicename.servicedomain.acme.com&d=DQICAg&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=__J_mRWed6v-NS1wLqgaOEJvgtKOvHgszu8ypqZazE4&m=CP9U3t6L9c-PNA20PaKy4y_9kXyMPWu-CMVY8k4mTzs&s=eiG9YeKpxBEa08csIC1refuQlh36WsYs9m40C9JEa1U&e=  to the internal address for admin, and external for connectivity from off-prem.

you _might_ be able to configure the hostname as the alias and configure the certificates accordingly, but like you said, it's not the standard approach.

---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
Computing and Communications Services (CCS) University of Guelph

519-824-4120 Ext 56354
lelio at uoguelph.ca
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.uoguelph.ca_ccs&d=DQICAg&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=__J_mRWed6v-NS1wLqgaOEJvgtKOvHgszu8ypqZazE4&m=CP9U3t6L9c-PNA20PaKy4y_9kXyMPWu-CMVY8k4mTzs&s=dT0cBVr2g7NJmVYHcvx2w4vy4mvvXnxaRVqRfNhbAps&e=
Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1

________________________________
From: cisco-voip <cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net> on behalf of Nick via cisco-voip <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 11:10 AM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Expressway MRA design question.

I have a customer who doesn't want the Expressway E FQDN to be put into the public DNS SRV record and wants to use an alias such as an a record in the collab-edge SRV which points to the public IP, I cant seem to find if this is supported or not can anyone confirm if this is supported?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__puck.nether.net_pipermail_cisco-2Dvoip_attachments_20170214_2eedd865_attachment-2D0001.html&d=DQICAg&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=__J_mRWed6v-NS1wLqgaOEJvgtKOvHgszu8ypqZazE4&m=CP9U3t6L9c-PNA20PaKy4y_9kXyMPWu-CMVY8k4mTzs&s=Tl9ht5734EzzO3fVnHfgcs8msDJzLrxp45A_Iqj5FoU&e= >

------------------------------

Message: 9
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 16:46:13 GMT
From: <mtarpey1 at optimum.net>
To: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>,
Cc: "voyp list, cisco-voip" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>,
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway MRA design question.
Message-ID: <e67a8f81205a.58a33455 at optonline.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

u might want to try to get a girlfriend

----- Original Message -----
From: Lelio Fulgenzi
Date: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 11:27 am
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway MRA design question.
To: "voyp list, cisco-voip"

> we tried this and it didn't work out so well. we didn't try to
> fix things because we were on a limited time frame. we also ran
> into an issue where the hostname has to match the outside
> name/certificate details as well as matching the service
> discovery domain).
>
>
> so, where we initially had https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__hostname.dept.acme.com&d=DQICAg&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=__J_mRWed6v-NS1wLqgaOEJvgtKOvHgszu8ypqZazE4&m=CP9U3t6L9c-PNA20PaKy4y_9kXyMPWu-CMVY8k4mTzs&s=YPOdbXhhZ7ub_DDPfWFO22yh3oBmFWsYXeBRyx47N54&e=  we had to
> modify it to https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__servicename.servicedomain.acme.com&d=DQICAg&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=__J_mRWed6v-NS1wLqgaOEJvgtKOvHgszu8ypqZazE4&m=CP9U3t6L9c-PNA20PaKy4y_9kXyMPWu-CMVY8k4mTzs&s=eiG9YeKpxBEa08csIC1refuQlh36WsYs9m40C9JEa1U&e= .
>
>
> then, in the split view dns, you resolve
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__servicename.servicedomain.acme.com&d=DQICAg&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=__J_mRWed6v-NS1wLqgaOEJvgtKOvHgszu8ypqZazE4&m=CP9U3t6L9c-PNA20PaKy4y_9kXyMPWu-CMVY8k4mTzs&s=eiG9YeKpxBEa08csIC1refuQlh36WsYs9m40C9JEa1U&e=  to the internal address for
> admin, and external for connectivity from off-prem.
>
>
> you _might_ be able to configure the hostname as the alias and
> configure the certificates accordingly, but like you said, it's
> not the standard approach.
>
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
> Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
> University of Guelph
>
> 519-824-4120 Ext 56354
> lelio at uoguelph.ca
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.uoguelph.ca_ccs&d=DQICAg&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=__J_mRWed6v-NS1wLqgaOEJvgtKOvHgszu8ypqZazE4&m=CP9U3t6L9c-PNA20PaKy4y_9kXyMPWu-CMVY8k4mTzs&s=dT0cBVr2g7NJmVYHcvx2w4vy4mvvXnxaRVqRfNhbAps&e=
> Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
> Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: cisco-voip on behalf
> of Nick via cisco-voip
> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 11:10 AM
> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [cisco-voip] Expressway MRA design question.
>
> I have a customer who doesn't want the Expressway E FQDN to be
> put into the public DNS SRV record and wants to use an alias
> such as an a record in the collab-edge SRV which points to the
> public IP, I cant seem to find if this is supported or not can
> anyone confirm if this is supported?
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__puck.nether.net_pipermail_cisco-2Dvoip_attachments_20170214_c6d23819_attachment-2D0001.html&d=DQICAg&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=__J_mRWed6v-NS1wLqgaOEJvgtKOvHgszu8ypqZazE4&m=CP9U3t6L9c-PNA20PaKy4y_9kXyMPWu-CMVY8k4mTzs&s=zOP9ZPLOcPxu98lmmCfc1mjxPpJjaDCcFeUBfYNevGI&e= >

------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__puck.nether.net_mailman_listinfo_cisco-2Dvoip&d=DQICAg&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=__J_mRWed6v-NS1wLqgaOEJvgtKOvHgszu8ypqZazE4&m=CP9U3t6L9c-PNA20PaKy4y_9kXyMPWu-CMVY8k4mTzs&s=OOCZoy5ttXI6Zd_bov0vjo8CSK_D9qFKtxCuAE2etaY&e=

------------------------------

End of cisco-voip Digest, Vol 160, Issue 13
*******************************************

________________________________

This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Winxnet, Inc. proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Winxnet, Inc.. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.