[cisco-voip] vg224 registered to two different Cm's

[mtarpey1 at optimum.net]

r u all done with penis/geek duals?

----- Original Message -----
From: Ryan Huff 
Date: Tuesday, January 17, 2017 3:40 pm
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] vg224 registered to two different Cm's
To: Scott Voll 
Cc: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" 

> My guess is either RIS or DNS resolution is acting wonky for the 
> gateway.
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Jan 17, 2017, at 2:45 PM, Scott Voll 
> > wrote:
> 
> sh ccm shows they resolve and are registered to the sub and 
> backup to the pub.
> 
> That is the wierd thing. as some voice ports show the sub and 
> some the pub....
> 
> we are looking at restarting the RIS data collector........
> 
> Scott
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Evgeny Izetov 
> > wrote:
> Can those VGs resolve the FQDNs? My guess they wouldn't even 
> register if they couldn't but maybe they are keeping some sort 
> of 'last known good' configuration.
> 
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 1:59 PM, Jeffrey McHugh 
> > wrote:
> Sometimes restarting RIS data collector can clear registration 
> anomalies
> From: Scott Voll 
> [mailto:svoll.voip at gmail.com]Sent: 
> Tuesday, January 17, 2017 1:58 PM
> To: Brian Meade >
> Cc: Jeffrey McHugh 
> >; cisco-
> voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] vg224 registered to two different Cm's
> 
> yup.... but did changed from IP to FQDN on the cluster..
> 
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Brian Meade 
> > wrote:
> Same Device Pool on all the ports?
> 
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Scott Voll 
> > wrote:
> sorry, mgcp...... did a no mgcp and mgcp. no change
> 
> reset from CM and all registered to cmsub reset but the once on 
> the pub didn't.
> 
> CM shows good replication on the DB's. it's the wierdest thing 
> I've seen.
> 
> Scott
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Brian Meade 
> > wrote:
> Try resetting all the ports from CUCM then maybe bounce SCCP on 
> the VG if that still didn't work.
> 
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Scott Voll 
> > wrote:
> All are in the same DP. we just changed from IP to FQDN over 
> the weekend. Any other thoughts?
> 
> Scott
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Jeffrey McHugh 
> > wrote:
> Pretty sure you can assign device pools to the specific ports, 
> different DP's may have diff. call mgr groups
> 
> From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-
> bounces at puck.nether.net> bounces at puck.nether.net>] On Behalf Of Scott Voll
> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2017 12:38 PM
> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [cisco-voip] vg224 registered to two different Cm's
> 
> How can some ports on a VG register to the pub and some to the 
> Sub on the same VG?
> 
> totally confused on this one.
> 
> CM 10.5.2 / VG vg224-i6k9s-mz.151-4.M9.bi> mz.151-4.M9.bi>n
> 
> Scott
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Jeffrey McHugh | Sr. Collaboration Consulting Engineer | VCP-
> DCV, CCNP Collaboration
> [Company_Logo_Image]
> Fidelus Technologies, LLC
> Named Best UC Provider in the USA> technologies-named-best-unified-communications-provider-in-the-usa/>
> 240 West 35th Street, 6th Floor, New York, NY 10001
> +1-212-616-7801 office | +1-212-616-
> 7850 fax | 
> www.fidelus.com[LinkedIn][Twitter][Facebook][YouTube]
> 
> 
> Disclaimer - January 17, 2017
> 
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential 
> and intended solely for Scott Voll,Brian Meade,cisco-
> voip at puck.nether.net. If you 
> are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, 
> distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions 
> presented in this email are solely those of the author and might 
> not represent those of Fidelus Technologies, LLC. Warning: 
> Although Fidelus Technologies, LLC has taken reasonable 
> precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email, the 
> company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage 
> arising from the use of this email or attachments.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20170117/bd0c66fd/attachment.html>