[cisco-voip] how long to let expressway updates bake

[Tim Frazee]

8.10 dropped and was wondering how fast people typically start planning for
upgrades. personally I'm waiting for 11.5(1)su3 to drop and sit for a bit
before i'd bother with 8.10, but just wanted to get the temp of the group.

On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Ryan Huff <ryanhuff at outlook.com> wrote:

> I'd personally say anything 8.8+ is good 2 go and it's mostly still just
> the Jabber stuff that doesn't work over MRA (which is documented).
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jul 17, 2017, at 3:20 PM, Tim Frazee <tfrazee at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> When I say "sit" would be how long do I let other Cisco customers find any
> serious issues before I would hop on. Wait for the "a" revision to drop.
> was typical back in the day. not sure if expressway had the same history.
>
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Ryan Huff <ryanhuff at outlook.com> wrote:
>
>> Not sure what you're referring to by "sit"? Are you referring to a
>> hardware burn-in of the host chassis the guest VM is running on?
>>
>> During the non-production period, is the business using it to validate
>> its configuration and usability for its specified business case? Usually,
>> once UAT (User Acceptance Testing) is completed and signed off on I would
>> kick it in to production during a scheduled window.
>>
>> For chassis burn-in, I like to see a week in the production racks.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -Ryan
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> > On Jul 17, 2017, at 10:32 AM, Tim Frazee <tfrazee at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > new to the expressway suite and was wondering whats the average wait
>> time (if any) for new versions of expressway to sit before you consider
>> them production worthy.
>> >
>> > for ucm/cup/cuc, I usually give it no more than a month before I would
>> consider it "stable" but was interested in what this group tends to lean to.
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > cisco-voip mailing list
>> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20170717/4229585a/attachment.html>