[cisco-voip] Field Notice: Cisco Unified Communications Manager Release 12.0(x) does not support some deprecated phone models - Cisco

Stephen Welsh stephen.welsh at unifiedfx.com
Mon May 1 12:35:35 EDT 2017


I’m case you are not aware, getting MigrationFX for free means it doesn’t have to be hard or expensive:

http://www.unifiedfx.com/get-migrationfx-for-free/

This is one of the reasons Cisco are starting to depreciate handsets, upgrading phones is ‘mostly' a hardware cost.

Kind Regards

Stephen Welsh
CTO

[cid:CBBF0493-235C-43D2-A874-9FB3D95AF598 at b2.unifiedfx.com]

On 1 May 2017, at 17:17, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca<mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca>> wrote:


Unfortunately, a lot of the ability to replace things comes from the end of support dates and the actual deprecation of devices being published. Without that, funding is diverted to things that need it. At least we’re seeing these deprecation notices a bit sooner (I think) so that helps.

I’ll tell you – with over 5000 7940/60s in the field – it ain’t gonna be pretty. But we’re working on it.

---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
University of Guelph

519-824-4120 Ext 56354
lelio at uoguelph.ca<mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca>
www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs>
Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1

From: Ryan Huff [mailto:ryanhuff at outlook.com]
Sent: Monday, May 01, 2017 10:23 AM
To: Brian Meade
Cc: Lelio Fulgenzi; cisco-voip voyp list
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Field Notice: Cisco Unified Communications Manager Release 12.0(x) does not support some deprecated phone models - Cisco

My guess is because of SLED and GOV. The 40s and 60s were nearly indestructible tanks with many still running. Cisco maybe giving them a longer shelf life to make the CapEx burden for new handsets easier to spread by slowly transitioning those models.

I wouldn't count on them being around forever or much longer though :).

On May 1, 2017, at 9:57 AM, Brian Meade <bmeade90 at vt.edu<mailto:bmeade90 at vt.edu>> wrote:
Very surprised to not see 7940/7960 in there.

On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 12:54 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca<mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca>> wrote:
Deprecation of old(er) phone models continue



The following phone models are newly deprecated as of the 12.0(x) release:

•  Cisco Unified Wireless IP Phone 7921

•  Cisco Unified IP Phone 7970

•  Cisco Unified IP Phone 7971

http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/rel_notes/12_0_1/deprecated_phones/cucm_b_deprecated-phone-models-for-1201.html


Sent from my iPhone

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20170501/3e4c937d/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1364 bytes
Desc: image003.png
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20170501/3e4c937d/attachment.png>


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list