[cisco-voip] 4g Router for site remote access?

[Thomas Toquothty]

I used cradlepoint at another job after a multi month delay in provisioning
a circuit during the VZ strike and once we got it up it was rock solid. I
don't believe we did voip over it but did IPSEC back and it never went down

On Wed, May 3, 2017, 6:52 PM chris <tknchris at gmail.com> wrote:

> We have built this and yes you can do voip you just have to workaround
> their udp/5060 ALG either by changing the destination port or encapsulate
> your traffic into a VPN. We also used cradlepoint and found them better
> than the VZ branded stuff. Whats nice about cradlepoint is you can let it
> do the celluar part which it is good at at and then just bridge it and plug
> into your network very easily.
>
> good luck
>
> chris
>
> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 6:45 PM, Haas, Neal <nhaas at co.fresno.ca.us> wrote:
>
>> Yes we use them, Verizon is the best connection in our area. Cannot do
>> VoIP calls over them. We have 1 out of 4 that needs to be reset every
>> night. Could be the tower we are connecting to.
>>
>>
>>
>> I actually used another type cradle point. You can do two SIM cards.
>> Worked good. They use cradle point in Red Boxes.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank You,
>>
>>
>>
>> Neal Haas
>>
>> NSE, Communications
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On
>> Behalf Of *'Jonatan Quezada'
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 3, 2017 3:27 PM
>> *To:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net; Adrian Arevalo-Orozco <
>> adrian.arevalo.orozco at chemeketa.edu>; Fernando Fernandez Lopez <
>> fferna12 at chemeketa.edu>; Rodolfo Ramirez <rodolfo.ramirez at chemeketa.edu>
>> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] 4g Router for site remote access?
>>
>>
>>
>> Is there anyone actually using these?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/routers/819-integrated-services-router-isr/datasheet_c78-732558.html
>>
>>
>>
>> I am looking at trying 2 of these at our farthest outreaches for IT
>> remote access and possibly, depending on coverage some SIP SRST testing in
>> the event of ppp failure to the pub and sub nodes?
>>
>>
>>
>> if someone has these deployed for them in some case, how is the
>> performance, caveats, gotchas? please advise.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Johnny Q
>>
>> Voice Technology Analyst - TelNet
>>
>> Chemeketa Community College
>>
>> Johnny.Q at chemeketa.edu
>>
>> Building 22 Room 131
>>
>> Work 5033995294 <(503)%20399-5294>
>>
>> Mobile 9712182110 <(971)%20218-2110>
>>
>> wMobile 5039323385 <(503)%20932-3385>
>>
>> SIP 9717185162 <(971)%20718-5162>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20170503/4e4be5cf/attachment.html>