[cisco-voip] Migrating a Cisco 2901 to a Cisco 4321

NateCCIE nateccie at gmail.com
Fri May 12 15:46:09 EDT 2017


TDM DSPs on the 4ks have to be on the NIM because there is no shared TDM clocking backplane like there is on the ISRs/ISR G2. 

Dspfarm stuff can use extra dsps on a NIM and the motherboard DSPs can only be used for dspfarm tasks. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On May 12, 2017, at 1:35 PM, Jose Colon II <jcolon424 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I was under the same assumption of why there was a dsp slot on the NIM. I know I read a Cisco doc somewhere that lead me that direction.
> 
>> On May 12, 2017 2:28 PM, "Ryan Huff" <ryanhuff at outlook.com> wrote:
>> So this is interesting; I was under the impression the backplane DSP could not extend to the NIM (and is the fundamental reason, among others, that the NIM has its own DSP) .... looks like I have a new lab task :).
>> 
>> On May 12, 2017, at 3:09 PM, Anthony Holloway <avholloway+cisco-voip at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Rashmi Patel ( rashmika.patel at zones.com ) - 12:31 PM
>>> Q: Does that mean conference resource will be used from NIM DSP not from mother board DSP resources
>>> Priority: N/A
>>> Dolan Spitler - 12:57 PM
>>> A: When it comes to IP services (xcoding, conferencing, MTP) The motherboard DSP can be pooled with the NIM DSPs to increase the DSPfarm scale
>>> 
>>> Source: https://communities.cisco.com/docs/DOC-7823 (look for the 4000 event on Oct 16th)
>>> 
>>>> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 1:17 PM Brian Meade <bmeade90 at vt.edu> wrote:
>>>> My understanding is any dspfarm resources such as conferencing/transcoding use the motherboard resources while the ones on the NIM are just for the voice ports themselves.
>>>> 
>>>>> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Jose Colon II <jcolon424 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> If you will be using DSP's you will need to decided if you will need them on the motherboard or on the T1 NIM. On the motherboard I believe it can only be used for conferencing. You will need them on the NIM for transcoding.
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On May 12, 2017 6:42 AM, "Ryan Huff" <ryanhuff at outlook.com> wrote:
>>>>>> T1 PRI commands are substantially different if that is in play.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On May 12, 2017, at 7:35 AM, Matthew Loraditch <MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The vast majority of commands are the same. Netflow stuff is changed completely if you use that.  Outside of updating interface names, most of our templates just worked.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Matthew G. Loraditch – CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R&S, CCDA
>>>>>>> Network Engineer
>>>>>>> Direct Voice: 443.541.1518
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | G+
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of norm.nicholson at kitchener.ca
>>>>>>> Sent: Friday, May 12, 2017 7:31 AM
>>>>>>> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>>>>>> Subject: [cisco-voip] Migrating a Cisco 2901 to a Cisco 4321
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> We have a base config we use for building our 2901/11’s . Will this work on the 4321 or do I have to start from scratch.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Norm Nicholson
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Telecom Analyst
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> City of Kitchener
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> (519) 741-2200 x 7000
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>>>>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>>>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>>>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20170512/b5276999/attachment.html>


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list