[cisco-voip] Spark Hybrid and MWI/Voicemail

[Lelio Fulgenzi]

Fair enough then. I can’t imagine the CTI libraries are going to be upgraded anytime soon.

It’s interesting you mention the UCM endpoint and not Connection, since Connection is the authoritative source for MWI.

Would a hybrid option for Connection be the right way to go?

Hmmmmmmm

---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph
Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 2W1
519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | lelio at uoguelph.ca<mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca>

www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs> | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook

[University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]

From: Stephen Welsh [mailto:stephen.welsh at unifiedfx.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2018 4:15 PM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
Cc: Brian Meade <bmeade90 at vt.edu>; cisco-voip voyp list <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Spark Hybrid and MWI/Voicemail

Technically it’s quite tricky to get MWI status from a UCM endpoint, the hybrid integration with spark leverages CTI for the SNR functionality, however Cisco’s CTI implementation does not include querying MWI status. So I guess that further complicates feature alignment for a hybrid system.

Kind regards

Stephen Welsh
CTO
UnifiedFX


On 13 Feb 2018, at 20:52, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca<mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca>> wrote:


Fair enough. And interesting news about the push away from IPC!

Here’s my counter argument.

Cisco Spark _has_ MWI. But for the Spark cloud calling service. What it doesn’t have is hybrid MWI.

So the feature exists to light a lamp per se and it’s being done by one system currently.

Technical restrictions aside, and I’m sure there are plenty, they’ve decided not to implement hybrid MWI.





---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph
Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 2W1
519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | lelio at uoguelph.ca<mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca>

www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs> | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook

<image001.png>

From: Stephen Welsh [mailto:stephen.welsh at unifiedfx.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2018 3:05 PM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca<mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca>>
Cc: Brian Meade <bmeade90 at vt.edu<mailto:bmeade90 at vt.edu>>; cisco-voip voyp list <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Spark Hybrid and MWI/Voicemail

My 2 cents…

From an Cisco Spark API perspective it’s a meeting room system as that is the model the User Experience is aligned for, so a long way to go for more traditional telephony features that are out of context for a meeting i.e. MWI.

Cisco Spark reminds me of the Windows 8 fiasco of making a desktop OS fit a tablet interface at the expense of normal desktop interactions, hence the swing back to normal desktop with Windows 10 etc. For me Cisco Spark is a "soft meeting" client that needs be extended to sensibly incorporate more traditional "soft phone" functionality/interactions.

That’s not to say Cisco Spark is not great at what it does, just that there needs to be more of a choice/overlap between Spark/Jabber, until then Spark will be more of a niche solution.

Also, it would appear all the marketing push for Cisco Spark has given Jabber a boost, and given Cisco have finally committed to port all relevant IP Communicator functionality to Jabber so IPC can be EOS that will keep Jabber at the primary soft phone solution for most larger organisations until Cisco can find a way forward with a unified soft phone solution.

Anyway, just my personal opinion, I’m sure others with disagree ;)

Kind Regards

Stephen Welsh
CTO
UnifiedFX



On 13 Feb 2018, at 17:20, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca<mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca>> wrote:


I could almost get away with “if you need uccx, use jabber; else, use spark”

But to say, “if you need MWI use jabber; else, use spark” – ugh.

I guess I don’t mind having two deployments, if the Jabber deployment is small and manageable.

It’s a shame, really. ☹


---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph
Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 2W1
519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | lelio at uoguelph.ca<mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca>

www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs> | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook

<image001.png>

From: bmeade90 at gmail.com<mailto:bmeade90 at gmail.com> [mailto:bmeade90 at gmail.com] On Behalf Of Brian Meade
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2018 10:37 AM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca<mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca>>
Cc: cisco-voip voyp list <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Spark Hybrid and MWI/Voicemail

No UCCX support has been the big killer for us suggesting it more as a Jabber replacement.

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 10:34 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca<mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca>> wrote:
Well, that is certainly disappointing. Spark makes a softphone deployment much easier, but not without key features like MWI.

I hate the fact that we’re going to have to deploy both to get all the features we want/need.



---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph
Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 2W1
519-824-4120 Ext. 56354<tel:(519)%20824-4120> | lelio at uoguelph.ca<mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca>

www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs> | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook

<image001.png>

From: bmeade90 at gmail.com<mailto:bmeade90 at gmail.com> [mailto:bmeade90 at gmail.com<mailto:bmeade90 at gmail.com>] On Behalf Of Brian Meade
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2018 10:31 AM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca<mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca>>
Cc: cisco-voip voyp list <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Spark Hybrid and MWI/Voicemail

Nothing I'm aware of.  Just completed one of these.  Basically just glorified SNR with URIs and some calendar integration.

On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 7:38 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca<mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca>> wrote:

Am I missing something?

Is there no voicemail integration with Connection? No MWI?

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collaboration/spark-hybrid-services/index.html



Sent from my iPhone

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20180213/00bbe06d/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1297 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20180213/00bbe06d/attachment.png>