[cisco-voip] vCUBE Experiences

Anthony Holloway avholloway+cisco-voip at gmail.com
Wed Jun 3 21:20:32 EDT 2020


Was that trunk to Twilio for CME?  If not, what was on the backside of your
gateway?  CUCM?  If so, was that in AWS too?

On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 6:54 PM Tim Smith <tim.smith at enject.com.au> wrote:

> Great question, also interested in hearing production stories.
>
> I've deployed Virtual Acme Packet's previously - same limitations - no
> DSP's etc.
> It was a little early and we had teething issues of appliance to virtual
> machine type stuff.. but through the updates this improved.
>
> I've played with CUBE on CSR1000V on AWS - SIP trunks to Twilio - and it
> works great.
> It's certainly so nice and easy to spin up.
> I've also run CSR1000V in AWS for dynamic VPN's.. which again works great.
>
> The DSP's are a nice fallback. You don't need them 99% of the time.. but
> when that 1% case comes up later - then it's certainly handy.
> I think that's a big reason vCUBE is not quoted in customer land.
> I assume it could be popular in service provider land though.
>
> With that Acme deployment (and this was actually years ago now) - we were
> migrating, so we still had PRI gateways with plenty of free DSP's, which we
> could use for Transcoders if required.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Tim.
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* cisco-voip <cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net> on behalf of
> Anthony Holloway <avholloway+cisco-voip at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, 4 June 2020 7:06 AM
> *To:* Cisco VoIP Group <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] vCUBE Experiences
>
>
> EXTERNAL SENDER WARNING. This message was sent from outside your
> organisation. Please do not click links or open attachments unless you
> recognise the source of this email and know the content is safe.
> Anyone have some vCUBEs out in production for a while, and willing to
> share their feelings and/or experiences with it?
>
> Anything from deployment, to restrictions, to licensing, to upgrade
> processes, lessons learned, etc?
>
> I think the obvious thing is the lack of DSP/PVDM since this is a virtual
> machine, but what else?
>
> I don't come across these in the field at all, and I don't see them being
> proposed or quoted these days, despite vCUBE having been around for a few
> years now.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20200603/e86d86fe/attachment.htm>


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list