[cisco-voip] [External] Re: Small business E911 solution

NateCCIE nateccie at gmail.com
Thu Dec 9 14:37:03 EST 2021


CUCM/CER is not complaint with Ray Baum’s act Phase II.  You will need to deploy Intrado or Redsky to be compliant.  I’ve only looked at them for existing CER customers, but I believe at least redsky has an option without CER.  Don’t worry you have less than a month until Phase II goes into effect on January 6th 2022.

 

https://www.fcc.gov/mlts-911-requirements

 

 

From: cisco-voip <cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net> On Behalf Of Johnson, Tim
Sent: Thursday, December 9, 2021 12:20 PM
To: Matthew Huff <mhuff at ox.com>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] [External] Re: Small business E911 solution

 

Maybe Intrado? Not sure their minimum requirements but I know we started with them when they were West, with only a couple hundred DIDs. 

 

On Dec 9, 2021 2:16 PM, Matthew Huff <mhuff at ox.com <mailto:mhuff at ox.com> > wrote:

No, hosted solution isn’t an option as we have a number of custom solutions like ring downs, etc…

 

We already have CUCM and Expressway working fine, I just need directions on the simplest solution for E911 for MRA workers.

 

Matthew Huff | Director of Technical Operations | OTA Management LLC

 

Office: 914-460-4039

mhuff at ox.com <mailto:mhuff at ox.com>  | www.ox.com <http://www.ox.com> 

...........................................................................................................................................

 

From: Matthew Loraditch <MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com <mailto:MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com> > 
Sent: Thursday, December 9, 2021 2:00 PM
To: Matthew Huff <mhuff at ox.com <mailto:mhuff at ox.com> >; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net <mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net> 
Subject: RE: Small business E911 solution

 

I’m very curious if you find something. I’m not aware of anything cost effective at your size. RedSky’s minimum purchase for a CUCM based system is 12-14k.

 

Have you looked at moving to a hosted phone system? Almost every vendor I’m aware of includes E911 therein

 



 



Matthew Loraditch​



Sr. Network Engineer


(He/Him/His)




p:  <tel:443.541.1518> 443.541.1518



w:  <http://www.heliontechnologies.com/> www.heliontechnologies.com

 | 

e:  <mailto:MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com> MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com



 <http://www.heliontechnologies.com/> 






 <https://facebook.com/heliontech> 


 <https://twitter.com/heliontech> 


 <https://www.linkedin.com/company/helion-technologies> 

From: cisco-voip <cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net <mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net> > On Behalf Of Matthew Huff
Sent: Thursday, December 9, 2021 1:34 PM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net <mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net> 
Subject: [cisco-voip] Small business E911 solution

 

[EXTERNAL]

 

We are in the process of moving from legacy ISDN PRI for inbound/outbound dialing to SIP, and E911 has hit us in the face. We have less than 50 users, where > 90% currently are working from home. They have the same prime dn for both the office phone and their home phone. We have users that have phones in 3-4 locations including in multiple states. What is the simplest solution to setup and maintain that doesn’t require a user to have a separate DID in each location? Cisco Emergency Responder looks like major overkill. 

 

Our environment is:

CUCM 14.x

Cisco Expressway 14.x for MRA

Cisco 8861 SIP phones (both at home and at work).

 

Matthew Huff | Director of Technical Operations | OTA Management LLC

 

Office: 914-460-4039

mhuff at ox.com <mailto:mhuff at ox.com>  | www.ox.com <http://www.ox.com> 

...........................................................................................................................................

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20211209/00a7fd37/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 6884 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20211209/00a7fd37/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 431 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20211209/00a7fd37/attachment-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 561 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20211209/00a7fd37/attachment-0002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.png
Type: image/png
Size: 444 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20211209/00a7fd37/attachment-0003.png>


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list