[cisco-voip] ATA 186 question

[Lelio Fulgenzi]

Please let us know what your final solution is. Whether one switch with one ATA, or 100/100.  It’s good to know.

Lelio

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 27, 2022, at 5:46 PM, Lisa Notarianni <lisa.notarianni at scranton.edu> wrote:



CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the University of Guelph. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. If in doubt, forward suspicious emails to IThelp at uoguelph.ca


All good ideas. Thanks again!!

On Jan 27, 2022, at 5:13 PM, James Buchanan <james.buchanan2 at gmail.com> wrote:


Hello,

There is also the option of keeping a few of the switches that were refreshed to use for the ATAs.

Thanks,

James

On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 10:10 PM Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca<mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca>> wrote:

Something to try is to get a cheap DLINK or Linksys switch and insert it between the new 9300uxm and the ata.  It might give you some options to get them working until you can replace them.

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 27, 2022, at 4:41 PM, Lisa Notarianni <lisa.notarianni at scranton.edu<mailto:lisa.notarianni at scranton.edu>> wrote:



CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the University of Guelph. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. If in doubt, forward suspicious emails to IThelp at uoguelph.ca<mailto:IThelp at uoguelph.ca>

Thank you all for your quick responses.  We will go beg for funding and replace the ATAs.  We cannot set speed to 10 since it is not an option according to our network engineer.

Lisa
From: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca<mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca>>
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2022 4:26 PM
To: Lisa Notarianni <lisa.notarianni at scranton.edu<mailto:lisa.notarianni at scranton.edu>>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] ATA 186 question


You might want to double check that. From this, 17.3, it shows 10 is a valid option.

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/catalyst9300/software/release/17-3/configuration_guide/int_hw/b_173_int_and_hw_9300_cg/configuring_interface_characteristics.html#task_uw1_3wc_g1b<https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cisco.com%2Fc%2Fen%2Fus%2Ftd%2Fdocs%2Fswitches%2Flan%2Fcatalyst9300%2Fsoftware%2Frelease%2F17-3%2Fconfiguration_guide%2Fint_hw%2Fb_173_int_and_hw_9300_cg%2Fconfiguring_interface_characteristics.html%23task_uw1_3wc_g1b&data=04%7C01%7Clisa.notarianni%40scranton.edu%7C0ba958685f444c7a7c4608d9e1e22682%7Ca8edc49a41f14c699768a7f6d7c3b8c3%7C0%7C0%7C637789184259613443%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=dPuzKYTZWv7Tg1lnwaK47lqsRx4gG3zPtN%2BBqyGa6Uk%3D&reserved=0>
Sent from my iPhone


On Jan 27, 2022, at 3:45 PM, Lisa Notarianni <lisa.notarianni at scranton.edu<mailto:lisa.notarianni at scranton.edu>> wrote:

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the University of Guelph. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. If in doubt, forward suspicious emails to IThelp at uoguelph.ca<mailto:IThelp at uoguelph.ca>

We just began Cisco switch upgrade to 9300s and ran into an unexpected issue.

We have many ATA 186s out there (about 100) and did not budget for replacement as we were gratefully approved for the massive overhaul of the switches.  This ended up being an unforeseen glitch.

We cannot get the ATA 186s to work on this switch with this IOS version:                               1 65 C9300-48UXM 17.03.04 CAT9K_IOSXE INSTALL
However, the 186s are working on this switch with this IOS version:                                          1 64 C9300-48P 16.9.5 CAT9K_IOSXE INSTALL

I know it is not an apples to apples comparison but I was wondering if anyone had a workaround for the newer model/IOS.

We believe the problem is that the ATA186s are hard coded at 10Mbps/half duplex.  Even if we change the switch port parameter from 0x00000000 to 0x000000ff  the ATA will not register.  The switch port is also configured at duplex auto but the slowest we can make the port is 100Mbps.

Is this not possible?  I am hoping you Cisco geniuses have a solution 😊

Lisa Notarianni
University of Scranton
Telecommunications Engineer
Infrastructure Services
800 Linden St.
Scranton PA 18510
570.941.4325

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpuck.nether.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcisco-voip&data=04%7C01%7Clisa.notarianni%40scranton.edu%7C0ba958685f444c7a7c4608d9e1e22682%7Ca8edc49a41f14c699768a7f6d7c3b8c3%7C0%7C0%7C637789184259613443%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=BZgFk8a1GkFONrBugWuNMPLDtFDdNFjAr1GFzwGh45E%3D&reserved=0>
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpuck.nether.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcisco-voip&data=04%7C01%7Clisa.notarianni%40scranton.edu%7C0ba958685f444c7a7c4608d9e1e22682%7Ca8edc49a41f14c699768a7f6d7c3b8c3%7C0%7C0%7C637789184259613443%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=BZgFk8a1GkFONrBugWuNMPLDtFDdNFjAr1GFzwGh45E%3D&reserved=0>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20220128/cf5ded67/attachment.htm>