<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META content="MSHTML 5.50.4937.800" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><SPAN class=003152816-15042005><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>National is preferred. Fewer quirks, more standard. Make sure
you are using MGCP gateways and CM will decode the calling party name from the
facility IE.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=003152816-15042005><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=003152816-15042005><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>/Wes</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=Tahoma
size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> Kris Seraphine
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net]<B>On Behalf Of </B>Kris
Seraphine<BR><B>Sent:</B> Friday, April 15, 2005 12:25 PM<BR><B>To:</B>
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<BR><B>Subject:</B> [cisco­voip] ISDN PRI Protocol
Selection<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=508481716-15042005><FONT face=Arial
size=2>Hi</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=508481716-15042005><FONT face=Arial
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=508481716-15042005><FONT face=Arial size=2>When ordering a
voice PRI for basic PSTN access, I'm usually asked choose either national or
custom as the protocol. In a CCM 4 environment, are there reasons to
choose one over the other? I know that they support calling name id
differently but I don't know if one method is better than the
other.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=508481716-15042005><FONT face=Arial
size=2>thanks</FONT></SPAN></DIV><!-- Converted from text/plain format -->
<P><FONT size=2>Kris Seraphine<BR></FONT></P>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV></BODY></HTML>