<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">It does work, but the units have to
be re-configured to support NAT. Then they are not able to call each
other internally on the network. It would be nice to have it work
without requiring constant reconfiguration. For a couple of units,
it works pretty well, but for 50+ units, it does tend to be a little bit
of work...</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Spencer<br>
</font><font size=2 face="Courier New">************************************************************<br>
Spencer Wood, Network Manager<br>
Ohio Department Of Transportation<br>
1320 Arthur E. Adams Drive<br>
Columbus, Ohio 43221</font><font size=3> </font>
<p><font size=2 face="Courier New">E-Mail: </font><a href=mailto:Spencer.Wood@dot.state.oh.us><font size=2 color=blue face="Courier New"><u>Spencer.Wood@dot.state.oh.us</u></font></a><font size=2 face="Courier New"><br>
Phone: 614.644.5422/Fax: 614.887.4021/Cell: 614.774.3123 <br>
*************************************************************</font><font size=3>
</font>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<table width=100%>
<tr valign=top>
<td width=40%><font size=1 face="sans-serif"><b>"Walenta, Phil"
<philip.walenta@berbee.com></b> </font>
<p><font size=1 face="sans-serif">04/25/2005 01:08 PM</font>
<td width=59%>
<table width=100%>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">To</font></div>
<td><font size=1 face="sans-serif">"Spencer Wood" <Spencer.Wood@dot.state.oh.us>,
<cisco-voip@puck.nether.net></font>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">cc</font></div>
<td>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Subject</font></div>
<td><font size=1 face="sans-serif">RE: [cisco-voip] Slight Off Topic: H323-to-H323
Video Gateway?</font></table>
<br>
<table>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<td></table>
<br></table>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size=2 color=blue face="Arial">Most firewalls these days do NAT
h.323 properly, so you could in theory NAT your VC unit inside so that
outside devices could reach it if I'm understanding your environment correctly.</font>
<br>
<br>
<hr><font size=2 face="Tahoma"><b>From:</b> cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Spencer
Wood<b><br>
Sent:</b> Monday, April 25, 2005 12:00 PM<b><br>
To:</b> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<b><br>
Subject:</b> [cisco-voip] Slight Off Topic: H323-to-H323 Video Gateway?</font><font size=3><br>
</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><br>
This message is a little bit off topic, so please feel free to here the
delete key.</font><font size=3> <br>
</font><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><br>
Anyway, does anyone know of a good H.323 to H.323 gateway for Video Conferencing??
Our Video Conferencing units sit inside our firewall, and we would
really like to give these units to natively call H.323 Video Conferencing
units on the Internet.</font><font size=3> <br>
</font><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><br>
Thoughts?<br>
Spencer</font><font size=2 face="Courier New"><br>
************************************************************<br>
Spencer Wood, Network Manager<br>
Ohio Department Of Transportation<br>
1320 Arthur E. Adams Drive<br>
Columbus, Ohio 43221</font><font size=3> </font>
<p><font size=2 face="Courier New">E-Mail: </font><a href=mailto:Spencer.Wood@dot.state.oh.us><font size=2 color=blue face="Courier New"><u>Spencer.Wood@dot.state.oh.us</u></font></a><font size=2 face="Courier New"><br>
Phone: 614.644.5422/Fax: 614.887.4021/Cell: 614.774.3123 <br>
*************************************************************</font><font size=3>
</font>
<p>