<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1505" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><SPAN class=859034817-17062005><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>I
absolutely agree with the second sentiment there. Selsius was painful and
when Cisco bought them I had no idea this would fall out of
it.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=859034817-17062005><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=859034817-17062005><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>To
address the first point, which I suspect that is their goal (to make the
callmanager more of a "linux appliance"), I'm somewhat bummed about that.
Even under windows, there are so many wonderful things that can be done by
having direct access to the OS, Databases, etc. (Many unsupported, that's
a given)</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=859034817-17062005><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=859034817-17062005><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>When I
first heard that the next CCM would be on Linux, I was fairly excited to have
the wealth of admin tools available to a linux system at my disposal for things
like reporting and such, but it appears that will likely not be the case in the
end. </FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=859034817-17062005><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=859034817-17062005><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>Oh
well. Their reasons for doing that make sense (support), even if I don't
have to like it.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=859034817-17062005><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=859034817-17062005><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>-Dylan
Vanderhoof</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=859034817-17062005><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>Sr.
VoIP Engineer</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=859034817-17062005><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>Semaphore Corporation</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=Tahoma
size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> Israel Lang
[mailto:zephy316@gmail.com]<BR><B>Sent:</B> Friday, June 17, 2005 6:01
AM<BR><B>To:</B> George Dormishev<BR><B>Cc:</B>
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco
CallManager under linux question<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>>From my
understanding, the back end will be totally invisible to everyone but Cisco
TAC. My Cisco SE has seen the system internally and says he really likes it
and thinks it will be a good thing for Cisco and its partners. I for one am
looking forward to it. <BR><BR>As someone who has been working with
CallManager since Cisco acquired it from Selsius, I am amazed at the advances
that have been made in less than a decade. I look forward to the opportunity
to be not so dependent on MS and some of their quirky architecture.<BR><BR>My
2 cents worth.<BR><BR>
<DIV><SPAN class=gmail_quote>On 6/17/05, <B class=gmail_sendername>George
Dormishev</B> <<A href="mailto:gdorm@is-bg.net">gdorm@is-bg.net</A>>
wrote:</SPAN>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=gmail_quote
style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(204,204,204) 1px solid">Yeah
no wonder that ver. 5.0 will be under linux but what kind of linux may
be<BR>Server Enterprise or workstation?<BR><BR>Thanks for the quick respons
to all of
you!<BR><BR>/George<BR>_______________________________________________
<BR>cisco-voip mailing list<BR><A
href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</A><BR><A
href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
</A><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><BR><BR><BR>-- <BR>Have a great
day!!!!!!!!!!<BR>zephy316_gmail.com<BR><BR>Replace the _ with an @ symbol
</BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>