<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:st1="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 11 (filtered medium)">
<!--[if !mso]>
<style>
v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style>
<![endif]--><o:SmartTagType
namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" name="Street"/>
<o:SmartTagType namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
name="address"/>
<!--[if !mso]>
<style>
st1\:*{behavior:url(#default#ieooui) }
</style>
<![endif]-->
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:Arial;
color:navy;}
@page Section1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
</head>
<body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple>
<div class=Section1>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>Interesting – Your example is exactly what’s
currently displayed. The 2801 H323 status shows not-registered also.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>The current designation for it in CCM as
the MGCP GW is the URL –- CCM would not allow using the same name for the H323
GW. Does what you say then mean that I can use it in the current state and
build a <st1:Street w:st="on"><st1:address w:st="on">CCM Route</st1:address></st1:Street>
to the GW IP addr and make calls through the H323 ports with a dialpeer match?<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>Thanks. Have a good weekend.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>Greg.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<div>
<div class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center'><font size=3
face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>
<hr size=2 width="100%" align=center tabindex=-1>
</span></font></div>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><font size=2 face=Tahoma><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Tahoma;font-weight:bold'>From:</span></font></b><font size=2
face=Tahoma><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma'> Kevin Thorngren
[mailto:kthorngr@cisco.com] <br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Sent:</span></b> Friday, September 16, 2005
3:12 PM<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>To:</span></b> gregmcallister@mchsi.com<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Cc:</span></b> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Subject:</span></b> Re: [cisco-voip] 2801 as
h323 to CCM</span></font><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:
12.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><font size=3
face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>Hi Greg,<br>
<br>
An H.323 GW won't register with CCM. If the IP Address is list as in the
example below then the GW and CCM have been communicating. But the registration
status will be unknown.<br>
<br>
Product : H.323 Gateway<br>
Gateway : 10.1.1.1<br>
Device Protocol: H.225<br>
Registration: Unknown<br>
IP Address: 10.1.1.1 <<<<<<br>
<br>
You will need to modify the current Route Patterns to point to the new H.323 GW
or Route List and configure the appropriate dial peers on the GW.<br>
<br>
Kevin<br>
<br>
On Sep 16, 2005, at 3:37 PM, Greg McAllister wrote:<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:
12.0pt'><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?color><?param 0000,0000,8080><?x-tad-bigger>Hi
Kevin,<br>
<?/x-tad-bigger><?/color><?/fontfamily><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?color><?param 0000,0000,8080><?x-tad-bigger>Well,
it’s currently config’d (and operating, of course) in CCM as an MGCP gateway
and they want it H323 so they can get CID. I’m probably making it harder than
necessary, but was hoping to still use the CCM dial-plan and just define the
FXO ports in the 2801 as h323 as necessary. The 2801 won’t register with the
CCM – it’s defined in CCM with the IP addr as the name . .<br>
<?/x-tad-bigger><?/color><?/fontfamily><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?color><?param 0000,0000,8080><?x-tad-bigger>Thanks.<br>
<?/x-tad-bigger><?/color><?/fontfamily><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?color><?param 0000,0000,8080><?x-tad-bigger> <br>
<?/x-tad-bigger><?/color><?/fontfamily><br>
<b><?fontfamily><?param Tahoma><?x-tad-bigger><span style='font-weight:bold'>From:</span><?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily></b><?fontfamily><?param Tahoma><?x-tad-bigger>
Kevin Thorngren [mailto:kthorngr@cisco.com]<br>
<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily><b><?fontfamily><?param Tahoma><?x-tad-bigger><span
style='font-weight:bold'>Sent:</span><?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily></b><?fontfamily><?param Tahoma><?x-tad-bigger>
Friday, September 16, 2005 2:25 PM<br>
<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily><b><?fontfamily><?param Tahoma><?x-tad-bigger><span
style='font-weight:bold'>To:</span><?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily></b><?fontfamily><?param Tahoma><?x-tad-bigger>
Greg McAllister<br>
<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily><b><?fontfamily><?param Tahoma><?x-tad-bigger><span
style='font-weight:bold'>Cc:</span><?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily></b><?fontfamily><?param Tahoma><?x-tad-bigger>
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>
<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily><b><?fontfamily><?param Tahoma><?x-tad-bigger><span
style='font-weight:bold'>Subject:</span><?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily></b><?fontfamily><?param Tahoma><?x-tad-bigger>
Re: [cisco-voip] 2801 as h323 to CCM<br>
<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily><?fontfamily><?param Times New Roman><?bigger><?bigger> <br>
<?/bigger><?/bigger><?/fontfamily><br>
<?fontfamily><?param Times New Roman><?bigger><?bigger>Hi Greg,<br>
<?/bigger><?/bigger><?/fontfamily><br>
<?fontfamily><?param Times New Roman><?bigger><?bigger>I haven't specifically
configured a 2801 as an H.323 GW with CCM but don't anticipate any issues as
CCM does not care about the specific platform when using H.323. Are you having
a specific issue?<br>
<?/bigger><?/bigger><?/fontfamily><br>
<?fontfamily><?param Times New Roman><?bigger><?bigger>Kevin<br>
<?/bigger><?/bigger><?/fontfamily><?fontfamily><?param Times New Roman><?bigger><?bigger>On
Sep 16, 2005, at 1:43 PM, Greg McAllister wrote:<br>
<?/bigger><?/bigger><?/fontfamily><?fontfamily><?param Times New Roman><?bigger><?bigger>Greetings:<br>
<?/bigger><?/bigger><?/fontfamily><?fontfamily><?param Times New Roman><?bigger><?bigger>Am
trying to config a 2801 as an H323 Gateway to Cisco Call Manager. Anyone done
this?<br>
<?/bigger><?/bigger><?/fontfamily><?fontfamily><?param Times New Roman><?bigger><?bigger>Thanks._______________________________________________<br>
<?/bigger><?/bigger><?/fontfamily><?fontfamily><?param Times New Roman><?bigger><?bigger>cisco-voip
mailing list<br>
<?/bigger><?/bigger><?/fontfamily><?fontfamily><?param Times New Roman><?bigger><?bigger>cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>
<?/bigger><?/bigger><?/fontfamily><?fontfamily><?param Times New Roman><?bigger><?bigger>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<?/bigger><?/bigger><?/fontfamily></div>
</body>
</html>