<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
even without QRT enabled, look back through CMR data for jitter and
packet loss trending.<br>
<br>
/Wes<br>
<br>
Erick Bergquist wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid20051001191127.84986.qmail@web34305.mail.mud.yahoo.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I'm just getting involved in this issue, but they and
others have been focusing on the ATM side and carrier
for past 6 months. It is vbr-nrt right now but
discussion of moving to -rt. I'm trying to rule out
any issues on the whole network end-to-end and any
potential phoneload/CCM issues since it is IP phone to
IP phone and occurs now and then on the same LAN
locally.
I don't believe SAA probes have been setup.
I added QRT softkey yesterday when I got involved and
awaiting results. Will have a few monday to look at.
Theres no encryption set up on phones, or on the
network, and since it's IP phone to IP phone in same
CCM cluster that would be CAC/location setting. The
phones aren't rebooting, etc so signalling and
keepalives are good and not getting lost. They also do
have external call quality issues for calls coming
across same WAN to a PRI but I'm focusing on the
Internal call issues for now, because the issues
causing that are going to magnify issues on external
calls.
Locations is set to 200k, and the router llq policy
has 256k for priority. No drops there. It's set for
match-any ip rtp clause and dscp ef (was before I got
involved). I'm still investigating the end-to-end QoS
settings amongst all devices the calls travel through
to make sure nothing is resetting dscp/etc.
I've done some 1000 packet size ping tests between the
CCM server and PCs at the remote site and its 40-45ms
response time. I know not a good test, but just
getting an idea.
--- "Dennis J. Hartmann" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:dhartma5@optonline.net"><dhartma5@optonline.net></a>
wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">        What are the SAA (Service Assurance Agent) voice
probes reporting
during this time? I'm assuming that SAA probes are
being sent in the first
place. If they're not, this would be an easy way of
completely ruling out
the network.
        What are the call volumes during this time?
        What CAC mechanism are you using? Locations does
not account for
IPSEC/SRTP and Layer 2 overhead. H.323 CAC does not
align with the priority
queues.
        I think the most important parameter would be the
delay incurred by
the ATM provider. Even though your not receiving
lost packets, you may want
to take a look at the jitter on the phone during
this time. Enable the QRT
(Quality Reporting Tool) and train the users to
click this soft key during
bad calls so you have something to go from.
        Also, enable CMR (call management records) that
will tag your CDRs
with QoS information so you can see what's going on
in the network side.
        Service providers have a very bad habit of maxing
out memory in the
TX and RX buffers so they delay ATM cells rather
than drop them.
Dennis Hartmann
CCVP/CCIP/CCNP/CCSI/MCSE
-----Original Message-----
From: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>
[<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On
Behalf Of Erick Bergquist
Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2005 1:40 AM
To: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
Subject: [cisco-voip] 7.1(2) voice quality issues,
IP phone to IP phone
Hi,
Just want to bounce this off list. Working on issue
on a 4.1(2)sr1 system
with 7960s on 7.1(2) currently.
They have 3 remote sites, ATM between sites. QoS/LLQ
is set and no drops but
users reporting issues with IP phone to IP Phone
calls, where the call will
be fine for a few minutes then after a few minutes
it starts to cut in and
out and progressively gets worse. The call doesn't
drop. No WAN/LAN
interface errors along path calls travel.
They have regions set, and are doing G729 between
sites and have 200k
bandwidth allocated under locations/CAC. No out of
resources (checked the
servers location performance counters). No drops on
QoS policies and LAN
appears to be ok with no visible issues.
They are also experincing echo on IP to IP phone
calls now and then between
sites, and between 2 IP Phones on same LAN in same
device pool (G711 in this
case).
I am aware of bug CSCeh01099 which may be playing a
factor here maybe, but
looking to see if anyone else has ran into this or
not. I'm pushing for a
phoneload update to 7.2(2) or 7.2(3) to start with
and have set up QRT
softkey on phone also. this bug id also mentions CCM
version for fix so do
also have to upgrade CCM to 4.1(3)sr1 to get
complete fix?
                
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://mail.yahoo.com">http://mail.yahoo.com</a>
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
                
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://mail.yahoo.com">http://mail.yahoo.com</a>
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>