<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 11 (filtered)">
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
        {font-family:Tahoma;
        panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0in;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:Tahoma;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {color:blue;
        text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
        {color:purple;
        text-decoration:underline;}
span.emailstyle17
        {font-family:Arial;
        color:windowtext;}
span.EmailStyle18
        {font-family:Arial;
        color:navy;}
span.EmailStyle19
        {font-family:Arial;
        color:navy;}
@page Section1
        {size:595.3pt 841.9pt;
        margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;}
div.Section1
        {page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
</head>
<body lang=EN-GB link=blue vlink=purple>
<div class=Section1>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>Following on from this question, what
would be the best way to implement these two new voice gateways, would it best
to have all phones pointing to one gateway and to use the second for failover
or to split up the phones on each gateway so that both are being used, obviously
I would then need to set up additional partitions and CSS.</span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'> </span></font></p>
<div>
<div class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center'><font size=3
face="Times New Roman"><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:
"Times New Roman"'>
<hr size=2 width="100%" align=center tabindex=-1>
</span></font></div>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><font size=2 face=Tahoma><span lang=EN-US
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-weight:bold'>From:</span></font></b><font size=2><span
lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.0pt'> Voll, Scott [mailto:Scott.Voll@wesd.org] <br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Sent:</span></b> Thursday, January 05, 2006
4:20 PM<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>To:</span></b> Nick Kassel;
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Subject:</span></b> RE: [cisco-voip] Advise
for recommended voice gateways</span></font></p>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face=Tahoma><span style='font-size:12.0pt'> </span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span lang=EN-US
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>It really depends on how
much expansion you will do down the road. If you’re just running a
single PRI E1 in each router you could use a small 28xx series router.
Basically any of your x8xx ISR routers will take you where you want to
go. </span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span lang=EN-US
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'> </span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span lang=EN-US
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>Scott</span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span lang=EN-US
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'> </span></font></p>
<div>
<div class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center'><font size=3
face="Times New Roman"><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:
"Times New Roman"'>
<hr size=2 width="100%" align=center tabindex=-1>
</span></font></div>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><font size=2 face=Tahoma><span lang=EN-US
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-weight:bold'>From:</span></font></b><font size=2><span
lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.0pt'> cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] <b><span style='font-weight:bold'>On
Behalf Of </span></b>Nick Kassel<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Sent:</span></b> Thursday, January 05, 2006
5:08 AM<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>To:</span></b> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Subject:</span></b> [cisco-voip] Advise for
recommended voice gateways</span></font></p>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face=Tahoma><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:
12.0pt'> </span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>I am looking for 2 new voice gateways to add to our existing
IPT infrastructure at our HQ, we currently have 13 remote sites all with their
own local H323 gateways, and we will be adding a further 12 remote sites
throughout the year up to around 250 users in total, plus we have about 50
phones at our HQ, the two voice gateways will be for our HQ, for rolling out up
to 500 users and also to be used for failover for the remote sites. They will
be used solely for voice. We will have two ISDN30 one on each gateway and they
will be housed in different building on the same site.</span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'> </span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>Just wondering what anyone can recommend for this setup,
also bearing in mind for future expansion and technologies such as SIP
integration.</span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><font size=3
face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman"'> </span></font></p>
<table class=MsoNormalTable border=0 cellpadding=0 bgcolor=white
style='background:white'>
<tr>
<td style='padding:.75pt .75pt .75pt .75pt'>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 color=black face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman";color:black'><br>
***********************************************************************************************<br>
<br>
The information contained in this e-mail is strictly confidential, some or all<br>
of which may be legally privileged. It is for the intended recipient only.<br>
Access to this e-mail by any other person is prohibited. If you are not the<br>
intended recipient, any use, disclosure, copying, printing, distribution of,<br>
replying to or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on this<br>
e-mail, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please contact the sender immediately<br>
should this e-mail have been incorrectly addressed or transmitted.<br>
<br>
You accept that any instructions are deemed to have been given at the time the<br>
recipient(s) accesses them and that delivery receipt does not constitute<br>
acknowledgement or receipt by the intended recipient(s). You accept that there<br>
may be a delay in processing the instructions received from e-mails after<br>
Charles Stanley has received them. You are advised that urgent, time sensitive<br>
and confidential communications should not be sent by e-mail. <br>
<br>
You acknowledge that e-mails are not secure and you accept the risk of<br>
malfunction, viruses, unauthorised interference, mis-delivery or delay.<br>
************************************************************************************************<br>
<br>
<br>
Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd<br>
Registered Office: 25 Luke Street London EC2A 4AR<br>
<br>
Tel: 0207 739 8200 Fax: 0207 739 7798<br>
Registered in England No. 1903304<br>
<br>
Charles Stanley Sutherlands and Tozer Wingate are divisions of Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd<br>
<br>
Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services Authority, Member of the<br>
London Stock Exchange, International Securities Markets Association, and The London International Financial Futures &<br>
Options Exchange.<br>
<br>
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by McAfee<br>
VirusScan and SurfControl Email Filter software.</span></font></p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span lang=EN-US
style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman"'> </span></font></p>
</div>
<br><br><table bgcolor=white style="color:black"><tr><td><br>***********************************************************************************************<br>
<br>
The information contained in this e-mail is strictly confidential, some or all<br>
of which may be legally privileged. It is for the intended recipient only.<br>
Access to this e-mail by any other person is prohibited. If you are not the<br>
intended recipient, any use, disclosure, copying, printing, distribution of,<br>
replying to or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on this<br>
e-mail, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please contact the sender immediately<br>
should this e-mail have been incorrectly addressed or transmitted.<br>
<br>
You accept that any instructions are deemed to have been given at the time the<br>
recipient(s) accesses them and that delivery receipt does not constitute<br>
acknowledgement or receipt by the intended recipient(s). You accept that there<br>
may be a delay in processing the instructions received from e-mails after<br>
Charles Stanley has received them. You are advised that urgent, time sensitive<br>
and confidential communications should not be sent by e-mail. <br>
<br>
You acknowledge that e-mails are not secure and you accept the risk of<br>
malfunction, viruses, unauthorised interference, mis-delivery or delay.<br>
************************************************************************************************<br>
<br>
<br>
Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd<br>
Registered Office: 25 Luke Street London EC2A 4AR<br>
<br>
Tel: 0207 739 8200 Fax: 0207 739 7798<br>
Registered in England No. 1903304<br>
<br>
Charles Stanley Sutherlands and Tozer Wingate are divisions of Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd<br>
<br>
Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services Authority, Member of the<br>
London Stock Exchange, International Securities Markets Association, and The London International Financial Futures &<br>
Options Exchange.<br>
<br>
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by McAfee<br>
VirusScan and SurfControl Email Filter software.<br>
</td></tr></table></body>
</html>