<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
My best source also agrees the target is 40,000.<br>
<br>
/Wes<br>
<br>
Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid001901c625e9$afc26c40$c901a8c0@deadfish"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; ">
<meta content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2802" name="GENERATOR">
<style></style>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">It's interesting, I just got
feedback from my SE who said 40,000 max on 4.1(x). </font></div>
<div> </div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">Quite honestly, I don't think it's a
matter of how many entries are in the table but rather how many are
being used at the same time. I'm sure SQL tables can easily handle
thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of entries. I'm also pretty
sure that the FAC/CMC tables are indexed so lookups should be
relatively quick as well.</font></div>
<div> </div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">I think what happens is that someone
says, "hmm, how many FACs/CMCs do you think anyone will ever use?" and
someone else says "i can't imagine anyone ever using more than 40,000"
and that's what they base their testing on. I've been in a few of the
CIPTUG sessions (and from being on the FAC committee) and they've
mentioned that they are going to try harder to bring customers in on
the design stages for stuff like this. Hopefully that happens soon.</font></div>
<div> </div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">For me, a variable length FAC is not
nearly as important as getting rid of the interdigit delay. Now my
users have to press FAC plus # where they didn't before. Not a big
deal, but a service parameter with "fixed FAC" or "fixed CMC" would
have been great.</font></div>
<div> </div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2"></rant></font></div>
<blockquote
style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(0, 0, 0); padding-right: 0px; padding-left: 5px; margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 0px;">
<div
style="font-family: arial; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 10pt; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal;">-----
Original Message ----- </div>
<div
style="background: rgb(228, 228, 228) none repeat scroll 0%; -moz-background-clip: -moz-initial; -moz-background-origin: -moz-initial; -moz-background-inline-policy: -moz-initial; font-family: arial; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 10pt; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal;"><b>From:</b>
<a title="baryonyx5@gmail.com" href="mailto:baryonyx5@gmail.com">Kris
Seraphine</a> </div>
<div
style="font-family: arial; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 10pt; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal;"><b>To:</b>
<a title="cisco-voip@puck.nether.net"
href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
</div>
<div
style="font-family: arial; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 10pt; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal;"><b>Sent:</b>
Monday, January 30, 2006 4:59 PM</div>
<div
style="font-family: arial; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 10pt; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal;"><b>Subject:</b>
[cisco-voip] Re: Client matter code limits</div>
<div><br>
</div>
I posted the question to the partner help desk and they gave me the OK
on 100,000 CMCs. <br>
<br>
I'll import them this evening and we'll see what happens. <br>
<br>
It sure would be nice if you could use wildcards in the CMC
configuration... <br>
<br>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 1/27/06, <b
class="gmail_sendername">Kris Seraphine</b> <<a
href="mailto:baryonyx5@gmail.com">baryonyx5@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Hi<br>
<br>
I have a client that currently uses ATT to provide non-authenticated
client matter codes for billing back customers. Whenever the customer
places a long distance call, the caller must enter a 5 digit number
before the call will go through. ATT will accept any 5 digit number.
It looks like the Callmanager implementation of CMC requires each code
to be defined in the database (and wildcards are not allowed) so to
replicate this functionality I'd need to import 100,000 codes. <br>
<br>
I couldn't find anything on CCO regarding an upper limit to the number
of codes supported but I'm not really excited about adding that many
records to the production database. <br>
<br>
Just wondering if anyone has been down this path before. <br>
<br>
thanks<br clear="all">
<br>
-- <br>
<span class="sg">kris seraphine </span></blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<br clear="all">
<br>
-- <br>
kris seraphine
<p> </p>
<hr> _______________________________________________<br>
cisco-voip mailing list<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
<hr size="4" width="90%">
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>