<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2802" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Definately, the DID service is the one that goes
with ER. That's an expensive route for both the PSALI service you have to
purchase from the carrier as well as the ER service from your telephony vendor.
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>But I'm 99.9% sure that if you use an LDN on your
PRI service (as far as I know, an LDN is a number which has specific handling
rules unlike DID which is part of a group and office route) you can modify the
emergency database record.</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=jsteinberg@gmail.com href="mailto:jsteinberg@gmail.com">Justin
Steinberg</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, February 16, 2006 4:02
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [cisco-voip] Smallest
Cheapest VGW</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>I believe this is how the E-911 server works. Relys on
having<BR>different emergency locations assigned to different DIDs. The
E911<BR>server then routes calls through the appropriate RP that changes
the<BR>calling party number.<BR><BR>I'm not sure if all telcos support this at
this time.<BR><BR>Justin<BR><BR>> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:51:54
-0500<BR>> From: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <<A
href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</A>><BR>> Subject: Re:
[cisco-voip] Smallest Cheapest VGW<BR>> To: "Voll, Scott" <<A
href="mailto:Scott.Voll@wesd.org">Scott.Voll@wesd.org</A>>, <<A
href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</A>><BR>>
Message-ID: <<A
href="mailto:009001c6333a$d1deff10$c801a8c0@deadfish">009001c6333a$d1deff10$c801a8c0@deadfish</A>><BR>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<BR>><BR>> Some carriers
offer a service whereby you can assign a specific emergency record to a number
on your PRI service. If you can get this, than you can configure route
patterns appropriately so that 911 calls from these phones still go out your
main site but are tagged with the site specific number, therefore, bringing up
the right emergency record.<BR>><BR>> ----- Original Message
-----<BR>> From: Voll, Scott<BR>> To: <A
href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</A><BR>>
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 2:00 PM<BR>> Subject: [cisco-voip]
Smallest Cheapest VGW<BR>><BR>><BR>> I have a remote site
(across the street) connected via Fiber to the Central Site. All PSTN
calls go out the main site. I'm a little concerned about 911
calls. So I'm thinking I may want to put a little VGW with a FXO over
there for 911 Calls. Not because I'm worried about the Fiber but because
I want 911 to have the correct address 2600 not
2611.<BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>> What is the smallest mgcp VGW I
can get that will just take IP to 911 out a FXO port. No routing
needed. Something like a ATA would be great. ( I know an ATA won't
work, but that's kinda what I'm looking for). At 2801 seems to be a
little over kill.<BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>>
Scott<BR>><BR>><BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>cisco-voip
mailing list<BR><A
href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</A><BR><A
href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</A><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>