So, we have a gateway. Two PRIs on the gateway go the way of the dodo... CallManager initiates a reset, and one responds and the other does not, one shows up 'not registered' the other 'unknown'...<br><br>Interestingly enough, when the PRIs came back up, both came up registered... 
<br><br><br><br>J<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 3/7/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Ryan Ratliff</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:rratliff@cisco.com">rratliff@cisco.com</a>&gt; wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Unknown for a device that does register with CM means CM hasn't even<br>had that device try to register.&nbsp;&nbsp;Not Registered would mean we've at<br>least seen a registration attempt from the device.<br><br>-Ryan<br><br>On Mar 7, 2006, at 3:23 PM, Jonathan Charles wrote:
<br><br>Thanks.<br><br>The gateway in question is MGCP with four PRIs, two are up, one shows<br>'not registered' and one shows 'unknown'...<br><br>I originally thought that if the CCM initiated a reset to the device<br>and it came back as not found, it would be 'unknown,' and if it was
<br>found, but down, it would be 'not registered'<br><br>(it seems to make sense)<br><br>But the device in question, all four PRIs were up, two are down now,<br>one is not registerd, the other is unknown... So, I have to rethink
<br>my theory.<br><br><br><br>Jonathan<br><br>On 3/6/06, Erick Bergquist &lt;<a href="mailto:erickbe@yahoo.com">erickbe@yahoo.com</a>&gt; wrote: Also, a device<br>that previously was &quot;Registered&quot; will<br>show &quot;Not Found&quot; if the server was rebooted and/or ccm
<br>service stopped and restarted and the device did not<br>register since the last starting of services either by<br>reboot or stopping/starting services.<br><br>I haven't really seen &quot;Unknown&quot; on objects that<br>
register unless there is something going on with the<br>servers, communications between servers, issues with<br>services, databases, etc.<br><br>I kind of wish H.323 gateways displayed something<br>other then &quot;Not Found&quot; so people didn't freak out that
<br>something was broken.<br><br>--- Lelio Fulgenzi &lt; <a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>&gt; wrote:<br><br> &gt; i'll have to keep an eye out on the unregistered and<br> &gt; unknown. that being said, i think this is what i was
<br> &gt; thinking about when i replied.<br> &gt;<br> &gt; not found....<br> &gt;<br> &gt;<br> &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; ----- Original Message -----<br> &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; From: Ortiz, Carlos<br> &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; To: Lelio Fulgenzi ; Jonathan Charles ; Cisco Voip
<br> &gt;<br> &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 7:28 PM<br> &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] &quot;Not Registered&quot; vs.<br> &gt; &quot;Unknown&quot; on Gatewayinterface...<br> &gt;<br> &gt;<br> &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; I think Scott was correct.&nbsp;&nbsp;An 
H.323 Gateway will<br> &gt; show unknown because CM never really knows the<br> &gt; status of the device.&nbsp;&nbsp;I think this is also the case<br> &gt; if a device has NEVER registered.<br> &gt;<br> &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; Once a device registeres and then becomes
<br> &gt; unreachable it goes to status unregistered.<br> &gt;<br> &gt;<br> &gt;<br>------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>------<br> &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">
cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a> on behalf<br> &gt; of Lelio Fulgenzi<br> &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; Sent: Mon 3/6/2006 7:22 PM<br> &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; To: Jonathan Charles; Cisco Voip<br> &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] &quot;Not Registered&quot; vs.
<br> &gt; &quot;Unknown&quot; on Gatewayinterface...<br> &gt;<br> &gt;<br> &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; I think it has to do with timing. A device will<br> &gt; show unregistered for a while, after which it shows<br> &gt; unknown. It could be after a restart, never really
<br> &gt; paid much attention.<br> &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; ----- Original Message -----<br> &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; From: Jonathan Charles<br> &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; To: Cisco Voip<br> &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 6:56 PM<br> &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Subject: [cisco-voip] &quot;Not Registered&quot; vs.
<br> &gt; &quot;Unknown&quot; on Gateway interface...<br> &gt;<br> &gt;<br> &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; So, what's the difference?<br> &gt;<br> &gt;<br> &gt;<br> &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Jonathan<br> &gt;<br> &gt;<br> &gt;<br> &gt;<br>------------------------------------------------------------------------
<br>----<br> &gt;<br> &gt;<br> &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; _______________________________________________<br> &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; cisco-voip mailing list<br> &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br> &gt;
<br> &gt; <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br> &gt; &gt; _______________________________________________<br> &gt; cisco-voip mailing list
<br> &gt; <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br> &gt; <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br> &gt;<br>
<br><br>__________________________________________________<br>Do You Yahoo!?<br>Tired of spam?&nbsp;&nbsp;Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around<br><a href="http://mail.yahoo.com">http://mail.yahoo.com</a><br><br>_______________________________________________
<br>cisco-voip mailing list<br><a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br><a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
</a><br><br></blockquote></div><br>