<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
We are having fun with this right now actually in CSCeg52684.<br>
<br>
"If the 9 is stripped on RL, then CDR reports called party number with
9.<br>
If we strip 9 on route pattern, then CDR reports called party number
without 9 as expected.<br>
CMR always reports called party number without 9."<br>
<br>
/Wes<br>
<br>
Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid001e01c6489c$93db7910$c901a8c0@EATIUSBIRDIUS"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; ">
<meta content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1528" name="GENERATOR">
<style></style>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">I have an intercluster trunk sending
calls from cluster A to cluster B on which the PSTN trunks are
registered. For the purposes of my testing I have to use the CDRs on
the cluster A in order to make sure the DN is registered correctly in
the CDR. I've configured routepatterns to keep the 9 so cluster B will
route things appropriately, unfortunately, this leave the 9 in the CDRs
on the cluster A.</font></div>
<div> </div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">Are there some configurations which
I can use which will not be recorded in the CDR? For example, can I add
the 9 to the route group or route list and not have it appear in the
CDR?</font></div>
<div> </div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">Lelio</font></div>
<div> </div>
<pre wrap="">
<hr size="4" width="90%">
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>