<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">well I know the 7940 and 60 if you wanted
to support all 48 phones you had to do a max inline power statemnet on
each port</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><br>
<br>
</font>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<table width=100%>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<td><font size=1 face="sans-serif"><b>"Carter, Bill" <bcarter@sentinel.com></b></font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Sent by: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</font>
<p><font size=1 face="sans-serif">04/20/2006 01:47 PM</font>
<td><font size=1 face="Arial"> </font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif"> To:
<cisco-voip@puck.nether.net></font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif"> cc:
</font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif"> Subject:
[cisco-voip] 7941G,
7961G Power Draw/Capacity with Cat 3560/3750 48pt switch</font></table>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="Tahoma">Can a 48 port Catalyst 3560 or Catalyst
3750 handle 48 79X1G phones pulling PoE from the switch?</font>
<br><tt><font size=3><br>
<br>
This email may contain proprietary and confidential information for the
sole use of the intended recipient. <br>
Any review, retransmission, dissemination, or other use of this information
by persons or entities other than <br>
the intended recipient is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient,
please contact the sender and <br>
delete all copies. To the extent that opinions are expressed in this message,
they are not necessarily the <br>
opinions of Sentinel Technologies or any of its affiliates, employees,
directors, officers or shareholders.<br>
</font></tt><tt><font size=2>_______________________________________________<br>
cisco-voip mailing list<br>
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<br>
</font></tt>
<br>