<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2873" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=812003023-02052006><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>It's not a fluke. It's there to label your Unity
ports. Makes reports and the monitor webpage look a little prettier in
some cases.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=812003023-02052006><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=812003023-02052006><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>I also believe it came from legacy integrations that may
have needed it.</FONT></SPAN></DIV><BR>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] <B>On Behalf Of </B>Zevier
Thoran<BR><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, May 02, 2006 5:41 PM<BR><B>To:</B> Cisco
Voip<BR><B>Subject:</B> [cisco-voip] Unity - CallManager integration
FLUKE?<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>Hi,<BR>In the UTIM tool that integrates Unity - CallManager, is it
necessary to fill up the 'Extension' column in the 'Ports' tab? Even when I keep
the Extension field empty, my integration works just fine... is it a
fluke?<BR>Please let me know.<BR>Thanks<BR>-Zevier.<BR><BR>
<P>
<HR SIZE=1>
Blab-away for as little as 1¢/min. Make <A
href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/postman2/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=39663/*http://voice.yahoo.com">PC-to-Phone
Calls</A> using Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. </BODY></HTML>