<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7226.0">
<TITLE>[cisco-voip] Unity .vs. Exchange 12</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV id=idOWAReplyText35442 dir=ltr>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>Check this site out, have not
played with it but do have MS engineers onsite that I will talk to.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><A
href="http://www.msexchange.org/ExchangeNews/February-2005-Exchange-12-Features-Announced.html">http://www.msexchange.org/ExchangeNews/February-2005-Exchange-12-Features-Announced.html</A></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr>b</DIV></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><BR>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net on
behalf of Corbett Enders<BR><B>Sent:</B> Wed 5/3/2006 10:01 AM<BR><B>To:</B>
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<BR><B>Subject:</B> [cisco-voip] Unity .vs. Exchange
12<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV>
<P><FONT size=2>Does anyone on the list have opinions yet on the upcoming
Exchange 12<BR>(2007) release? It is going to be a fully unified messaging
system and<BR>voicemail will be an integrated component right out of the
box<BR>(apparently).<BR><BR>Has anyone seen this or played with this and have
any comments? <BR><BR>If this is the case, I can't see any reason to
continue using Cisco<BR>Unity once Exchange is
released.<BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>cisco-voip
mailing list<BR>cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<BR><A
href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</A><BR></FONT></P></DIV>
</BODY>
</HTML>