<div>Yep, exactly why I'm having to do the train upgrade.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The latest patches I wanted to install were the July ones. The latest matrix shows these as installed as part of 2000.4.3aSr2 or 2000.4.2sr?. Given 2000.4.2 has been pulled as an upgrade, 2000.4.3 is the only path to get the latest approved patches installed.
</div>
<div> </div>
<div>-Nathan<br><br> </div>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 7/25/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Ryan Ratliff</b> <<a href="mailto:rratliff@cisco.com">rratliff@cisco.com</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">What latest patches for Windows are you wanting to apply? Remember<br>on an MCS platform if you don't download it from
<a href="http://cisco.com">cisco.com</a> don't put<br>it on there. Installing patches directly from <a href="http://microsoft.com">microsoft.com</a> is not<br>supported.<br><br>-Ryan<br><br>On Jul 24, 2006, at 9:24 PM, Nathan Reeves wrote:
<br><br>Wanted to throw the Q out before I kick off the upgrade later this<br>week. Just realised that we can't install the latest patches for<br>Windows without upgrading to the latest train of OS, which I'd been<br>putting off until now.
<br><br>Currently running 2000.2.7Sr8 (+ 4 additional patches) and will<br>upgrade to 2000.4.3aSr2. Installation on our lab servers seems fine,<br>but has anyone else done this upgrade and seen any issues in<br>production? Just never 100% confident that a problem free upgrade on
<br>a lab server servicing 5 endpoints is a great representation of a<br>production system servicing 2000 endpoints.<br><br>Thanks<br><br>Nathan<br>_______________________________________________<br>cisco-voip mailing list
<br><a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br><a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br><br></blockquote></div>
<br>