that's a good thought. <br><br>Unfortunately I don't think it applies to this case. I'm coming right off the block. Unless the telco is doing something outside the building. <br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 8/25/06,
<b class="gmail_sendername">Scott Coner (US)</b> <<a href="mailto:scott.coner@us.didata.com">scott.coner@us.didata.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div>
<div link="blue" vlink="blue" lang="EN-US">
<div>
<p><font color="navy" face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; color: navy;">I had a similar problem with a customer
and it turned out to be low voltage on the POTS line. In my case the low
voltage situation was being caused by an inline surge protector on the POTS
line. </span></font></p>
<p><font color="navy" face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; color: navy;"> </span></font></p>
<p><font color="navy" face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; color: navy;">Scott</span></font></p>
<p><font color="navy" face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; color: navy;"> </span></font></p>
<div>
<div style="text-align: center;" align="center"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">
<hr align="center" size="2" width="100%">
</span></font></div>
<p><b><font face="Tahoma" size="2"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Tahoma; font-weight: bold;">From:</span></font></b><font face="Tahoma" size="2"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Tahoma;">
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">
cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">On Behalf Of </span></b>Kris Seraphine<br>
<b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b> Friday, August 25, 2006 2:27
PM<br>
<b><span style="font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b> cisco-voip<br>
<b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b> [cisco-voip] FXO calls
disconnect when answered</span></font></p>
</div></div><div><span class="e" id="q_10d46b08e5f42601_1">
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Hi<br>
<br>
I've been struggling with this issue for over a month and both I and TAC seem
to be stumped. <br>
<br>
I have a customer with a small office that we are trying to migrate to a
centralized CCM cluster. They have a 1760V with 4 analog lines that we
want to connect to an FXO card. When we connect the lines to the router for
testing I get the following behavior. <br>
<br>
PSTN caller calls into the system. <br>
The IP phone user hears the phone ring and answers the call.<br>
The IP phone user sees the call disconnect After a second or two, the call
begins to ring again on the IP phone If the IP phone user answers the call
again, the call disconnects and the process repeats The PSTN caller hears
ringback the whole time. <br>
<br>
The problem seems to be that the router is interpreting a disconnect coming
from the telco.<br>
<br>
Trace snippet:-<br>
008192: .Jul 31 08:36:28.484: htsp_process_event: [2/0,<br>
FXOLS_PROCEEDING, <br>
E_HTSP_CONNECT]fxols_offhook_connect <br>
008193: .Jul 31 08:36:28.488: [2/0] set signal state = 0xC timestamp = 0<br>
008194: .Jul 31 08:36:28.488: htsp_timer_stop<br>
008195: .Jul 31 08:36:28.488: htsp_process_event: [2/0, FXOLS_CONNECT,<br>
<br>
E_HTSP_VOICE_CUT_THROUGH]fxols_connect_proc_voice <br>
008196: .Jul 31 08:36:28.716: htsp_process_event: [2/0, FXOLS_CONNECT,<br>
<br>
E_DSP_SIG_0100]fxols_normal_battery<br>
008197: .Jul 31 08:36:28.744: htsp_process_event: [2/0, FXOLS_CONNECT,<br>
<br>
E_DSP_SIG_1100]fxols_offhook_disc <br>
<br>
I've talked to the CO guy but he's been little help. I did have them run
a ground start trunk for testing but it exibits the same behavior. <br>
<br>
I've tried every combination of battery-reversal supervisory disconnect etc...
that I can think of but I cannot seem to solve this problem. <br>
<br>
TAC does not think its hardware related but I'm going to send a replacement
router out just in case. <br>
<br>
I'm hoping someone might have some suggestions for me. <br>
<br>
Thanks in advanced. <br>
<br>
Kris Seraphine <br>
CCIE No. 15163, MCSE<br>
<a href="mailto:Kris.Seraphine@cliftoncpa.com" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">Kris.Seraphine@cliftoncpa.com</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<br clear="all">
<br>
-- <br>
kris seraphine </span></font></p>
</span></div><div></div>
</div>
<div><p></p><hr size="1"><p></p><br>
<p><strong><br>
Disclaimer:<br>
<br>
This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain<br>
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the<br>
designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the<br>
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received<br>
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of<br>
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be<br>
unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please<br>
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it<br>
from your computer. Thank you.<br>
</strong></p></div>
</div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>kris seraphine